Jump to content
SubSpace Forum Network

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
!@#$%^&* dying in a fire; he should freeze to death. You're on here !@#$%^&*ing that you contacted a hooker (probably on craigslist or something equally re!@#$%^&*ed) and the cops ruined your !@#$%^&*? Pretty obviously a fake hooker sting by the cops you stupid !@#$%^&*. And next time try to make your verbal !@#$%^&* spew somewhat intelligible before you start calling other people stupid for not being able to understand it.
Posted

1st off:

 

I just read this topic and regret it.. i want the last 2 mins of my life back and the 40 points by IQ dropped.

 

2nd.

 

Attraction you dumb freak.

No one !@#$%^&*ing cares, no one would notice that you left because you're always posting !@#$%^&*. I am 100% sure you are some fat short kid with no friends trying not to look like a !@#$%^&*. Just stop posting pointless topics and gtfo faster.

Posted
On the plus side, now that attraction believes that the FBI/CIA/UFIA are monitoring everyone all the time through the intertubes he may never use a computer again!
Posted
On the plus side, now that attraction believes that the FBI/CIA/UFIA are monitoring everyone all the time through the intertubes he may never use a computer again!

Indeed.....or he may just start talking normally!

Posted
Then losa is not a girl!

 

Anyways my apology for not using the english language well enough.

 

This post has been edited by attraction: Today, 02:53 PM

 

 

Lol, notice that he edited the post, clearly because he was attempting to reconstruct his ridiculous sentences.

Posted

I think they are just holding onto the 18+ law. As she is 17 it is illigal as she is underage. It is also illigal because you are 17 and underage to view.

 

It doesnt make any sence as you are both of the same age but under the strict letter of the law this is how things will stand from my interpritation.

Posted (edited)
I think they are just holding onto the 18+ law. As she is 17 it is illigal as she is underage. It is also illigal because you are 17 and underage to view.

 

It doesnt make any sence as you are both of the same age but under the strict letter of the law this is how things will stand from my interpritation.

 

 

dav that "girl" is 14 not 17 read earlyr posts he made (while back where he sayd he met a girl thats 14)

 

 

EDIT: Please move this to the spam lounge so it can be removed within a few days

Edited by Hellonearth
  • 2 weeks later...
Guest kleine bitch
Posted
.................. I ment 17 for this one stfu.

 

you accidentally added the "1" again...lol

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...