Stylez Posted November 17, 2003 Author Report Posted November 17, 2003 Stop saying cuase lol I'll make you a deal, I'll stop saying cuase if you stop being a prick to me and stop being ugly....... lalala..... still waiting.........
Stylez Posted November 17, 2003 Author Report Posted November 17, 2003 when did I ever they were? tehehe, I'm having to much fun as of right....... now
ntfx Posted November 17, 2003 Report Posted November 17, 2003 when did I ever they were? tehehe, I'm having to much fun as of right....... now Please make sure your posts make sense... It's a waste of time right now.
Stylez Posted November 17, 2003 Author Report Posted November 17, 2003 when did I ever they were? tehehe, I'm having to much fun as of right....... now Please make sure your posts make sense... It's a waste of time right now. I'm sorry net, next time I'll put it in lamens terms for you...... I missed one word and you cant understand a -*BAD WORD*- thing, its like putting one of those cones around a dogs head, they just dont get it do they?
ntfx Posted November 17, 2003 Report Posted November 17, 2003 You have experience with cones? Now we all know where you stupidity comes from
Stylez Posted November 17, 2003 Author Report Posted November 17, 2003 You have experience with cones? Now we all know where you stupidity comes from oh ohh good one net, yea we all get ya, i'm a dunce, derrrr.... -*BAD WORD*-in dork, all your doing here man is showing how much you hate me and wanted me gone from day one. Thanks
Tempest Posted November 17, 2003 Report Posted November 17, 2003 Okay, long post, so please be patient. Joker/Stylez/Whatever it is you choose to call yourself these days - I have very little against you. I know almost nothing about the cir-*BAD WORD*-stances upon which you base your complaint, and can only comment on the views and opinions expressed here. I can't judge your argument, as such, but I feel obliged to raise a few objections on the validity of your argument and various inconsistencies in your posts. The basic thrust of your argument, as I interpret it, is that ntfx's actions against you were unjustified in that you only claimed to be able to circulate the source without actually doing so. To further your claim, you've brought up an example for another staffer who committed a similar act but against whom no action was taken. It can be argued, however, that ntfx was perfectly justified in taking action against you. The transgressions against the zone rules are as follows: threatening to spread Continuum source code and, as I gathered from Rifleman's quotes, abusing ?help after numerous warnings. You defend yourself against the first allegation by claiming that you were "bull-*BAD WORD*-ting about all the source code -*BAD WORD*-". Nonetheless, you are making the !@#$%^&*umption here that ntfx is aware of this. If he were not aware, would it not be reasonable to take a pre-emptive action to prevent a future transgression? Perhaps leeway is given to offenses of a less substantial nature, but surely spreading the source code is an important enough reason to take such action? You also argue that a staff member sent trojans to an unidentified party, and you seem to infer that since no action was taken in the above case, your own case should also be exempt. This is, however, flawed: your accusation about sending the trojan has no direct consequence on the zone - nor was it committed within the bounds of Continuum. It would be logical, then, to accept that the two cases are sufficiently different to warrant no credit by direct comparison? I see no defense in your posts which defends the second offense, and I can only conclude that you cannot, in good faith, construct a valid argument against this accusation. Do the rules not clearly state that abuse of ?help and ?cheater will result in intervention by a moderator? QUOTE:"but still you people are just like me, it's just that I don't suck up to anyone of you people, thus I get into fights with everyone of you from time to time, just some more then others...." Please clarify this point - in what way are we 'just like' you? Your statement seems to imply that the only manner in which 'we' are different from you is that 'we' seem to 'suck up to people'. What do you mean by that? You seem to suggest that we are 'going out of our way' to ingratiate ourselves to others - but I have not yet seen an example of this supposed behaviour on this post. ntfx's actions certainly don't cons!@#$%^&*ute 'sucking up to people', and nor, as I can see, are any of the comments made by staffers here. If, by the above phrase you mean that staffers always take ntfx's side in arguments like these, then you are again mistaken - there is a difference between 'sucking up' and stating an opinion derived from logical inferences of the situation. Furthermore, DaKillaRoach contradicts ntfx's views - how, then, can you claim that this undeclared 'we' are 'just like' you? QUOTE:"-*BAD WORD*- half the zone be gone if it were up to you." This line of argument seems to be undermined by your previous threads in which you claimed to somehow be able to make half the zone disappear. QUOTE:"But all in all, this is a good thing that happened to me, kinda snapped me out of my re-*BAD WORD*-ed ways that I was getting back into. I needed something to get me away from this game. So thanks guys" You seem to be holding onto some notion that you are in some way superior because of your non-commitance into the game. It seems strange, then, that you are arguing at all - never mind the fact that you were the one who started this thread in the first place. Your argument here is also undermined by that fact that you were (and, in fact, are) still pointlessly insulting several members of staff - if you have better things to do, then why waste time here?
Stylez Posted November 17, 2003 Author Report Posted November 17, 2003 and you were the one that had my ban free removed, wow, thats like having a gun pointed a guy who murdered your whole family, well not the best analogy, but you get what I mean....
ntfx Posted November 17, 2003 Report Posted November 17, 2003 I a good reason to remove your banfree and many people were there who agreed with me.
Stylez Posted November 17, 2003 Author Report Posted November 17, 2003 Okay, long post, so please be patient. Joker/Stylez/Whatever it is you choose to call yourself these days - I have very little against you. I know almost nothing about the cir-*BAD WORD*-stances upon which you base your complaint, and can only comment on the views and opinions expressed here. I can't judge your argument, as such, but I feel obliged to raise a few objections on the validity of your argument and various inconsistencies in your posts. The basic thrust of your argument, as I interpret it, is that ntfx's actions against you were unjustified in that you only claimed to be able to circulate the source without actually doing so. To further your claim, you've brought up an example for another staffer who committed a similar act but against whom no action was taken. It can be argued, however, that ntfx was perfectly justified in taking action against you. The transgressions against the zone rules are as follows: threatening to spread Continuum source code and, as I gathered from Rifleman's quotes, abusing ?help after numerous warnings. You defend yourself against the first allegation by claiming that you were "bull-*BAD WORD*-ting about all the source code -*BAD WORD*-". Nonetheless, you are making the !@#$%^&*umption here that ntfx is aware of this. If he were not aware, would it not be reasonable to take a pre-emptive action to prevent a future transgression? Perhaps leeway is given to offenses of a less substantial nature, but surely spreading the source code is an important enough reason to take such action? You also argue that a staff member sent trojans to an unidentified party, and you seem to infer that since no action was taken in the above case, your own case should also be exempt. This is, however, flawed: your accusation about sending the trojan has no direct consequence on the zone - nor was it committed within the bounds of Continuum. It would be logical, then, to accept that the two cases are sufficiently different to warrant no credit by direct comparison? I see no defense in your posts which defends the second offense, and I can only conclude that you cannot, in good faith, construct a valid argument against this accusation. Do the rules not clearly state that abuse of ?help and ?cheater will result in intervention by a moderator? QUOTE:"but still you people are just like me, it's just that I don't suck up to anyone of you people, thus I get into fights with everyone of you from time to time, just some more then others...." Please clarify this point - in what way are we 'just like' you? Your statement seems to imply that the only manner in which 'we' are different from you is that 'we' seem to 'suck up to people'. What do you mean by that? You seem to suggest that we are 'going out of our way' to ingratiate ourselves to others - but I have not yet seen an example of this supposed behaviour on this post. ntfx's actions certainly don't cons!@#$%^&*ute 'sucking up to people', and nor, as I can see, are any of the comments made by staffers here. If, by the above phrase you mean that staffers always take ntfx's side in arguments like these, then you are again mistaken - there is a difference between 'sucking up' and stating an opinion derived from logical inferences of the situation. Furthermore, DaKillaRoach contradicts ntfx's views - how, then, can you claim that this undeclared 'we' are 'just like' you? QUOTE:"-*BAD WORD*- half the zone be gone if it were up to you." This line of argument seems to be undermined by your previous threads in which you claimed to somehow be able to make half the zone disappear. QUOTE:"But all in all, this is a good thing that happened to me, kinda snapped me out of my re-*BAD WORD*-ed ways that I was getting back into. I needed something to get me away from this game. So thanks guys" You seem to be holding onto some notion that you are in some way superior because of your non-commitance into the game. It seems strange, then, that you are arguing at all - never mind the fact that you were the one who started this thread in the first place. Your argument here is also undermined by that fact that you were (and, in fact, are) still pointlessly insulting several members of staff - if you have better things to do, then why waste time here? funny, you really dont know what your talking about, plus i love how your absoloutly making me out to be the bad guy, thanks man. Btw, I dont have any source code for any game, dont want it dont need it and wouldnt know what to do with it if I did.... Also, if your gonna come into an argument, try not to be so biased, thanks
Tempest Posted November 17, 2003 Report Posted November 17, 2003 Joker, it's just the way I'm seeing it by looking at all these threads. If you can argue against it, please enlighten me. I'm trying to see if you can justify your opinions. I've said nothing that can't be logically inferred from you and ntfx's posts. I'm not trying to offend you. I'm trying to see if your arguments have enough integrity to hold up to criticism.
Stylez Posted November 17, 2003 Author Report Posted November 17, 2003 I a good reason to remove your banfree and many people were there who agreed with me. give me all the names of who agree'd with you, i bet everyone of them are all anti-joker in 17th peeps.... anyways, you have no gorund to speak net... everything we've been typing is useless arguments, basically what it boils down too is I got banned for a source code no one even knows if I really have, for knowing how to hack things, and for using a command more then 3 times and all without ever trying to be talked to about it before I got rebanned. Wow, I love people sometimes...
Cencil Posted November 17, 2003 Report Posted November 17, 2003 Hi BarbieHi Ken!Do you wanna go for a ride?Sure Ken!Jump In... I'm a barbie girl, in a barbie worldLife in plastic, it's fantastic!you can brush my hair, undress me everywhereImagination, life is your creationCome on Barbie, let's go party! I'm a barbie girl, in a barbie worldLife in plastic, it's fantastic!you can brush my hair, undress me everywhereImagination, life is your creation I'm a blond bimbo girl, in a fantasy worldDress me up, make it tight, I'm your dollyYou're my doll, rock'n'roll, feel the glamour in pink,kiss me here, touch me there, hanky panky...You can touch, you can play, if you say: "I'm always yours" (uu-oooh-u) I'm a barbie girl, in a barbie worldLife in plastic, it's fantastic!you can brush my hair, undress me everywhereImagination, life is your creation Come on Barbie, let's go party!(Ah-ah-ah-yeah)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(uu-oooh-u)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(Ah-ah-ah-yeah)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(uu-oooh-u) Make me walk, make me talk, do whatever you pleaseI can act like a star, I can beg on my kneesCome jump in, bimbo friend, let us do it again,hit the town, fool around, let's go partyYou can touch, you can play, if you say: "I'm always yours"You can touch, you can play, if you say: "I'm always yours" Come on Barbie, let's go party!(Ah-ah-ah-yeah)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(uu-oooh-u)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(Ah-ah-ah-yeah)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(uu-oooh-u) I'm a barbie girl, in a barbie worldLife in plastic, it's fantastic!you can brush my hair, undress me everywhereImagination, life is your creation I'm a barbie girl, in a barbie worldLife in plastic, it's fantastic!you can brush my hair, undress me everywhereImagination, life is your creation Come on Barbie, let's go party!(Ah-ah-ah-yeah)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(uu-oooh-u)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(Ah-ah-ah-yeah)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(uu-oooh-u) Oh, I'm having so much fun!Well Barbie, we're just getting startedOh, I love you Ken!
Tempest Posted November 17, 2003 Report Posted November 17, 2003 QUOTE:funny, you really dont know what your talking about It may be so, but at least tell me *how* and *why*.
Stylez Posted November 17, 2003 Author Report Posted November 17, 2003 Bah your gonna make me respond to all of this, fine fine, here you go princess... Okay, long post, so please be patient.no kiddin... I'll try too.... Joker/Stylez/Whatever it is you choose to call yourself these days - I have very little against you. Bobby, and thats nice I know almost nothing about the cir-*BAD WORD*-stances upon which you base your complaint, and can only comment on the views and opinions expressed here.Are you sure your not being a lil biased with all of this, I mean your making it out to be like I'm a criminal here...... I can't judge your argument, as such, but I feel obliged to raise a few objections on the validity of your argument and various inconsistencies in your posts. Oh but you already are.... oh you do, do you now? And what makes you think that? Hence you werent even there or here when all this took place. The basic thrust of your argument, as I interpret it, is that ntfx's actions against you were unjustified in that you only claimed to be able to circulate the source without actually doing so.I want you to go and ask a moderator to ban someone else for spreading source code data, I bet they'll say, we need to get hard evidence that that person has the source code, we cant just ban him/her for no reason... not with me though... To further your claim, you've brought up an example for another staffer who committed a similar act but against whom no action was taken. Similar, son, having a source coe of a game and spreading viruses (while both illegal) aren't the same thing.... It can be argued, however, that ntfx was perfectly justified in taking action against you.Was he now......? The transgressions against the zone rules are as follows: threatening to spread Continuum source code and, as I gathered from Rifleman's quotes, abusing ?help after numerous warnings. Have you ever did a ?help, ?cheater, or ?host command more then 3 times before? Oh I'm sure you have, were you banned for it? I'm sure you weren't.... Either way, they can always put me on ignore or silence me.... I didn't threaten to spread anything, I simply asked if anyone wanted to see part of the source code, and it was a -*BAD WORD*-ing joke that no one bothered to ask if I was being serious about... You defend yourself against the first allegation by claiming that you were "bull-*BAD WORD*-ting about all the source code -*BAD WORD*-". Nonetheless, you are making the !@#$%^&*umption here that ntfx is aware of this.Maybe becuase I was? and I'm not !@#$%^&*uming net of anything, I just simply wanted to know, for a good reason, why I was rebanned.... If he were not aware, would it not be reasonable to take a pre-emptive action to prevent a future transgression? MIRC, MSN, YAHOO, AIM, ANOTHER ZONE...... dude, if I had the source code, what would banning me from 17th do to stop me from spreading it? and if I did have it, you really think I'm dumb enough to go into chat with tons of moderators and tell them I have something that could get me in lots of trouble (and actually have it and give it out)? Dont answer that... Perhaps leeway is given to offenses of a less substantial nature, but surely spreading the source code is an important enough reason to take such action?Well it would seem so now wouldn't it? You also argue that a staff member sent trojans to an unidentified party, and you seem to infer that since no action was taken in the above case, your own case should also be exempt. No I posted that just to be a -*BAD WORD*-.... No pun attended But bottom line, she confessed to doing it and no ones said anything about it... strange how the neglect things like that huh? This is, however, flawed: your accusation about sending the trojan has no direct consequence on the zone - nor was it committed within the bounds of Continuum.You'd think that wouldn't you? Well what if I said I sent you a doomsday virus blah blah and wiped out your whole pc, but it was through msn... you think I should be able to get away with that in SS? It would be logical, then, to accept that the two cases are sufficiently different to warrant no credit by direct comparison? Really? you think? I never meant them to be... I see no defense in your posts which defends the second offense, and I can only conclude that you cannot, in good faith, construct a valid argument against this accusation. Do the rules not clearly state that abuse of ?help and ?cheater will result in intervention by a moderator?intervention, hmmm, you mean banning someone for 5000 days when they could've simply shut me up by using the silence command, nifty huh? QUOTE:"but still you people are just like me, it's just that I don't suck up to anyone of you people, thus I get into fights with everyone of you from time to time, just some more then others...." Please clarify this point - in what way are we 'just like' you? Your statement seems to imply that the only manner in which 'we' are different from you is that 'we' seem to 'suck up to people'. What do you mean by that? You seem to suggest that we are 'going out of our way' to ingratiate ourselves to others - but I have not yet seen an example of this supposed behaviour on this post. ntfx's actions certainly don't cons!@#$%^&*ute 'sucking up to people', and nor, as I can see, are any of the comments made by staffers here. If, by the above phrase you mean that staffers always take ntfx's side in arguments like these, then you are again mistaken - there is a difference between 'sucking up' and stating an opinion derived from logical inferences of the situation. Furthermore, DaKillaRoach contradicts ntfx's views - how, then, can you claim that this undeclared 'we' are 'just like' you? I mean that you people are just as re-*BAD WORD*-ed acting as I am on that stoopid game, just not as outlandish as I am on it... mainly becuase a lot of you dont have balls... Hmm what else could I mean by, you suck up to people.... hmmmmm......hmmmmmmmm..hmmmmmm.. sry Does everytihng I say here have to reflect only towards what I say in this one topic? Couldn't I mean in other cir-*BAD WORD*-stances? perhaps... Wow your trying way to hard to implement big words into your sentences brother, try to be a lil less confusing when you type something, use more lamens terms for the novices out there, like meh Either way, whos to say net doesn't suck up to anyone? do you watch him 24/7? didn't think so... QUOTE:"-*BAD WORD*- half the zone be gone if it were up to you." This line of argument seems to be undermined by your previous threads in which you claimed to somehow be able to make half the zone disappear.That was a whole different subject man, your getting into the past now, thats not fair! QUOTE:"But all in all, this is a good thing that happened to me, kinda snapped me out of my re-*BAD WORD*-ed ways that I was getting back into. I needed something to get me away from this game. So thanks guys" You seem to be holding onto some notion that you are in some way superior because of your non-commitance into the game. It seems strange, then, that you are arguing at all - never mind the fact that you were the one who started this thread in the first place. Your argument here is also undermined by that fact that you were (and, in fact, are) still pointlessly insulting several members of staff - if you have better things to do, then why waste time here? I'm superior, muhahaha, look at my bulgeing muscels, muhaha, jk I started this thread to get something answered that has yet to be answered, funny huh? Members of staff are people like you and me, doesn't make them any less perfect then anyone else, thus makes them vunerable to my superior attacks!! POW POW BANG BANG!!! Becuase I dont have a life..... Well man did that answer most your questions... like I said your whole argument here is a very biased one.... everything here I had to respond too becuase everything here was an argument about me.... Get some sense of open mindedness when you type something out man... you'll be a great debater if you realize that oneday.... Peace...
Stylez Posted November 17, 2003 Author Report Posted November 17, 2003 Hi BarbieHi Ken!Do you wanna go for a ride?Sure Ken!Jump In... I'm a barbie girl, in a barbie worldLife in plastic, it's fantastic!you can brush my hair, undress me everywhereImagination, life is your creationCome on Barbie, let's go party! I'm a barbie girl, in a barbie worldLife in plastic, it's fantastic!you can brush my hair, undress me everywhereImagination, life is your creation I'm a blond bimbo girl, in a fantasy worldDress me up, make it tight, I'm your dollyYou're my doll, rock'n'roll, feel the glamour in pink,kiss me here, touch me there, hanky panky...You can touch, you can play, if you say: "I'm always yours" (uu-oooh-u) I'm a barbie girl, in a barbie worldLife in plastic, it's fantastic!you can brush my hair, undress me everywhereImagination, life is your creation Come on Barbie, let's go party!(Ah-ah-ah-yeah)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(uu-oooh-u)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(Ah-ah-ah-yeah)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(uu-oooh-u) Make me walk, make me talk, do whatever you pleaseI can act like a star, I can beg on my kneesCome jump in, bimbo friend, let us do it again,hit the town, fool around, let's go partyYou can touch, you can play, if you say: "I'm always yours"You can touch, you can play, if you say: "I'm always yours" Come on Barbie, let's go party!(Ah-ah-ah-yeah)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(uu-oooh-u)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(Ah-ah-ah-yeah)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(uu-oooh-u) I'm a barbie girl, in a barbie worldLife in plastic, it's fantastic!you can brush my hair, undress me everywhereImagination, life is your creation I'm a barbie girl, in a barbie worldLife in plastic, it's fantastic!you can brush my hair, undress me everywhereImagination, life is your creation Come on Barbie, let's go party!(Ah-ah-ah-yeah)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(uu-oooh-u)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(Ah-ah-ah-yeah)Come on Barbie, let's go party!(uu-oooh-u) Oh, I'm having so much fun!Well Barbie, we're just getting startedOh, I love you Ken! I know your just trying to be funny cencil and all, but thats real sad that you took all that time to type down every phrase of that song and in perfect per-nuct-u-a-tion.....
Stylez Posted November 17, 2003 Author Report Posted November 17, 2003 Atleast we're getting offtopic again What staffers do best huh net?
Cencil Posted November 17, 2003 Report Posted November 17, 2003 www.azlyrics.com need I say owned?...perhaps owned to the max.
Stylez Posted November 17, 2003 Author Report Posted November 17, 2003 www.azlyrics.com need I say owned?...perhaps owned to the max. uhh uhhhhh.... cencil, may I ask if you are still a virgin? 20 years later...... so, you've been laid yet cencil? sucks being ugly and rejected huh?
MikeTheNose Posted November 17, 2003 Report Posted November 17, 2003 Flame war....closed. First note that it is against policy to explain publically or privately to staff about why someone was banned or even fired from staff. Such action is humiliating.Let me state the reason as to why joker was banned. He was banned because of numerous har!@#$%^&*ment of players and staff members. Along with countless misuse of staff communicational lines that only served to aggravate those who have to deal with it. Joker has always been a pain when it comes to authority and when he needed a kick in the -*BAD WORD*-, he only caused more trouble, especially when he got back from a ban. A banfree is a privilage to recieve and is en!@#$%^&*led to no-one. Once given, that banfree can be removed at any time without a reason.
Recommended Posts