Strangness

[rootbear75]

fi yuo cna raed tihs, yuo hvae a sgtrane mnid too

 

Cna yuo raed tihs? Olny 55 plepoe out of 100 can.

i cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in waht oerdr the ltteres in a wrod are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whotuit a pboerlm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

Edited November 16, 2007 by rootbear75

[Incomplete]

Seen it before, I thought more people could read it though.

[Russky]

it is probably more than 55/100 counting only people that can read i've done this before

[JDS]

pretty much if you have a more than basic reading ability , reading the word with first and last letter swaped should be no issue. So the % who cant read it are people with below- basic abilitys to read.

[Dav]

this proves only one thing...

 

I dnot need a froum porof raeder!

[»doc flabby]

deos not wrok, and is haox. it rieels on lreetts iidnse bneig in a carietn oderr. cidbgrame Edited November 16, 2007 by doc flabby

[»Purge]

they should write novels using this form of spelling. would be much more fun than reading repe!@#$%^&*ive old english.

[rootbear75]

deos not wrok, and is haox. it rieels on lreetts iidnse bneig in a carietn oderr. cidbgrame

i cant understand what you said...

[Drake7707]

deos not wrok, and is haox. it rieels on lreetts iidnse bneig in a carietn oderr. cidbgrame

i cant understand what you said...

 

Really?

 

it says: "does not work, and is a hoax, It relies on letters inside being in another order. Cambridge"

 

And "only 55 of 100 can read this", wouldn't be surprised if only 70 of 100 can read at all >.>

[rootbear75]

srsly... i couldnt understand the last part of it (after haox)

[candygirl]

srsly... i couldnt understand the last part of it (after haox)

 

That was a ez one root

And somthing like this was posted here at one time. (the one that you posted root)

Edited November 16, 2007 by candygirl

[rootbear75]

srsly... i couldnt understand the last part of it (after haox)

 

That was a ez one root

And somthing like this was posted here at one time. (the one that you posted root)

o rly?

[Samapico]

deos not wrok, and is haox. it rieels on lreetts iidnse bneig in a carietn oderr. cidbgrame

How is it a hoax? Particular order or not, the letters are mixed up and you can still read it. Though reading your post was indeed harder than reading their text... But even if it's a 'particular' order, i'd be curious to see how they came up with it, and what makes that particular order readable.