Women 2.0

[rootbear75]

just looking over the women thread and im tempted to start up a new one....

 

Edited November 13, 2007 by rootbear75

[Incomplete]

It's not porn. If a woman posted a picture of a topless guy wearing swimming shorts then is that considered porn?

[rootbear75]

no, but the link i had was topless girls Edited November 13, 2007 by rootbear75

[Incomplete]

Oh well that suppose that could be considered porn then. The first women topic got closed because it was too pornographic apparently. Guess some people have never seen a real porno.

[rootbear75]

 

dont wanna jeopardize my chances (albeit slim) of becoming mod... so i think i will refrain from posting

Edited November 13, 2007 by rootbear75

[Incomplete]

Probably a good idea.

[★ Dav]

as long as its kept clean it will be fine i expect.

[rootbear75]

as long as its kept clean it will be fine i expect.

please do expand on ur definition of "clean"

[Incomplete]

I think he means not showing any rude bits. :x

[Russky]

no chesticles :\

[★ D1st0rt]

Sequels are almost always a bad idea, don't ride off of someone else's previous successes

[★ Dav]

I think he means not showing any rude bits. :x

thats pretty much it. Im sure you wont need more explanation then that.

 

Of course the view of the other mods, Smods and admins may differ to mine so do not take my word as the rules on this one but that's where I will stand unless told otherwise.

[Incomplete]

Yeah well freakmonger closed the last one so I guess if another one was created then it would be closed again anyway.

[★ Dav]

indeed. As far as the rules go I think polix will need to clarify them before you will have a definite answer on this one.

 

[edit]I just rememberd the rules were updated after the last one to include (soft)

 

1. No (soft) Pornographic or Racist topics or posts allowed. Any will be deleted' date=' and the user will be banned.[/quote']

 

looks like you wont be able to post much then.[/edit]

[Incomplete]

So therefor it would be against the rules for girls to put pictures of topless men on here too?

[🜲 Samapico]

well, soft pornography, imo, includes nude stuff

 

Anything PG13 should be ok, aka no nipplez

[★ Purge]

i saw nipplez in a PG-13 movie...

[Suicide_Run]

Nice purge, wat movie was that? lol

[★ candygirl]

we own you guys and you dont even know it

[★ Dav]

and what do you base this on candygirl?

[rootbear75]

imo soft porn = topless only...

[Cancer+]

Do you really need to post pictures of girls in bikinis? Can't you just go look at them and do your own thing. No need to post them on here. It only causes drama between people that do want them and people that don't want them. This is a forum for Continuum, not showing !@#$%^&*ties and !@#$%^&*.

[rootbear75]

Do you really need to post pictures of girls in bikinis? Can't you just go look at them and do your own thing. No need to post them on here. It only causes drama between people that do want them and people that don't want them. This is a forum for Continuum, not showing !@#$%^&*ties and !@#$%^&*.

hey... shhh... i havent posted any so shhhhhhhhh

[🜲 Samapico]

Every forum has a babe pics thread though.

[★ Purge]

then we can be the first without one