Chambahs Posted August 30, 2007 Report Posted August 30, 2007 Narchs and Zeta rang a bell in my head, but ive only been playing for 7 years, oldbies? what do you guys think? Im sure polix is gonna jump on this one.
julia Posted August 30, 2007 Report Posted August 30, 2007 My squad? Anarchists, we're turning 10 in November.
Samapico Posted August 30, 2007 Report Posted August 30, 2007 Are you searching for a squad that is still active?Or are you looking for the first person who ever used ?squadcreate ?
PoLiX Posted August 30, 2007 Report Posted August 30, 2007 There is far too many, and Zeta is older than 7yrs. ReDs comes to mind, or !@#$%^&* Yankees... uh... hmm... LAME... Dunno, there is a lot of em that have been around for ages.
»freakmonger Posted August 30, 2007 Report Posted August 30, 2007 ReDs, DY, Warlords, Phatboys, Nigthwatch, Exodus, just stop by premier league. Most of those squads have been around since VIE.
Testtube Posted August 31, 2007 Report Posted August 31, 2007 The squad bloodlust which i am on has been around since version .89
oCon Posted September 1, 2007 Report Posted September 1, 2007 Betrayal, ReDS, !@#$%^&*_Yankees..Red Hawks is pretty old I guess..I dunno that was a long time ago
julia Posted September 1, 2007 Report Posted September 1, 2007 (edited) I say squads that have died and then reformed don't count, must be active. I doubt those squads are older than 10 years. Except maybe Bloodlust, I remember them from dueling arizona way back in the beta days. Are they active still? Edited September 1, 2007 by julia
jacob hunter! Posted September 2, 2007 Report Posted September 2, 2007 I wish there was a squad usage command
paralyse Posted September 3, 2007 Report Posted September 3, 2007 EyeQ was around in late 96 when I started playing, so were Fireknives (FK), ReDs, and several others whose names are lost to time.
Dezolate Posted September 11, 2007 Report Posted September 11, 2007 im pretty sure both reds and zeta (from their swz branch) are older than narchs
»freakmonger Posted September 11, 2007 Report Posted September 11, 2007 Yea I'd have to agree with dez on that one.
The Real Picard Posted September 11, 2007 Report Posted September 11, 2007 One word, one truth, one squad... )(MasteR)(
Samapico Posted September 12, 2007 Report Posted September 12, 2007 trp... your sig is like... huge... :S 3/4 of my screen
Incomplete Posted September 12, 2007 Report Posted September 12, 2007 Wasn't there a limit put on sigs?
»Maverick Posted September 12, 2007 Report Posted September 12, 2007 He has been warned and informed about it. There is a limit on the number of characters in the signature but unfortunately that doesn't restrict of adding large images into the signature. However, the rules are that it isn't allowed to have a signature of over 300 px in height. This isn't tightly enforced but enforced where necessary.
rootbear75 Posted September 12, 2007 Report Posted September 12, 2007 He has been warned and informed about it. There is a limit on the number of characters in the signature but unfortunately that doesn't restrict of adding large images into the signature. However, the rules are that it isn't allowed to have a signature of over 300 px in height. This isn't tightly enforced but enforced where necessary.basically, its only enforced when someone says something about it
CardSharp Posted September 13, 2007 Report Posted September 13, 2007 Kinetic... throw your K's! Haha probably Zeta, ReDs, Narchs, but Im not as old as some of you fogies.
Gravitron Posted September 13, 2007 Report Posted September 13, 2007 (edited) Doomsday, Harvesters of Sorrow, OneSpirit, Fusion, SpecOps, Armageddon, ONE, BlackDragon, Requiem, ShadowSyndicate and many more... Edited September 13, 2007 by Ori Klein
The Apache Posted September 13, 2007 Report Posted September 13, 2007 ... and are they active still? no?
Recommended Posts