Method Analysis of 3.1.04

[⛊ Drake7707]

I'm running DCME project through my newly created analysis program. It generates which methods calls and are called by which, generated in HTML so you can browse through the methods. I hope it gives a better view for anyone who wants to edit stuff.

 

Buuuut it can take a while, 1480 methods, and about 1 done every 2 seconds. (Consider the fact that it has to do 1480*1480 + the overhead of backtracking where the method is located, it's pretty fast)

 

i'll post results when it's done

 

Edit: it's done, there are a few flaws in it that it didn't recognize well, but it should be correct for the most part

 

http://dcme.sscentral.com/dcmeAnalysis/Overview.html

 

Don't mind the Description sometimes, it takes the first following comments in each method, so usually thats where comments are written, but sometimes commented blocks end up there

[L.C.]

I found a butt load of possibly unreported bugs in the mean time, unfortunately I got too lazy to report them. One of them was that I couldn't save _server118.lvl to a freshly created, empty directory. In otherwords..

 

/

/DirectoryA/

/DirectoryA/_server118.lvl

/DirectoryB/

 

And I try to save _server118.lvl to /DirectoryB/ and get some error like 54 or 56 (somewhere in the 50s?). Checked the debug log and it simply just said _server118.lvl in /DirectoryB/ didn't exist.

[★ CRe]

Happens to me too...

[L.C.]

And do you plan to add a toggle button to the LVZ-moving tool that would control whether the image will be rendered with transparency or not (and if with transparency, what color and how much in percent it would be transparent)? I found it a neat finding that after importing an LVZ (and having a bunch of images bogusly stacked at the same coordinate) got DCME to render them all as additive transparency, which was pretty neat.

 

Next time I encounter bugs here, I'll be sure to report them.

[⛊ Drake7707]

problem with the DCME.log file (thats the file not found error) (blame sama, not me )

 

fixed

 

toggle transparency i can do, but not with intensity & color, because it's a simple bitblt hack rather than alphablend api (bitblt goes a bazillion times faster)