women

[Audry]

I love Jared.

 

tututudum

 

and ya trp its a tattoo, a little small one cause im scared of it anyway its a little cat paw

Edited May 17, 2007 by Audry

[rootbear75]

I concur.

 

EDIT: Unfortunantly, D1 has stepped to losa's side and deleted my post that was telling all of you that i would give out my personal collection of attraction's underwear/nude/clothed pics, so i wont offer to give them out anymore, before losa commits suicide. Offer turned back. Blame D1.

 

Thank you D1 for editing my posts.

thats what you get for posting at 3 in the !@#$%^&*ing morning

[Shock]

Even college ball is better than pro ball.

AMEN, BROTHA!

[No_Remorse]

I would like to address some of these posts in further detail, but I have about 10 minutes until I have to leave for work or I'll probably get stuck in traffic.

 

NBVegita, thank you for taking the time to statistically compare both Iverson and Paul's rookie years. Also you say that, quote...

 

Paul may have been rookie of the year, but he will never accomplish anything more. Iverson has the heart and drive nobody else does. who else can carry his team to the finals like iverson did with the 2001 Sixers? nobody on that team averaged more than 10 points other than iverson. all he had were OK players: rebounders, shot blockers, etc. Paul will never be on Iverson's level. Iverson is a scorer, he can miss 10 straight and can't wait to take another shot. i love that about him.

 

So first you say the Hornets players are skilless/no good/nobodies. Now by saying that all Iverson's teammates were "OK players" or bad players in his rookie year, you are implying that Paul's teammates, the ones, last I checked, you were badmouthing left right and centre, are above average/good players? Contradict much?

 

And LOSA, how does Iverson having one good game(58 points vs. the Hornets) a few years ago prove anything regarding his overall ability? Oh right, I forgot, Iverson is the best player of all time, even better than Michael Jordan... LMFAO! You just lost all credability with that comment alone. Do you think youre *opinion* is right compared to countless NBA analysts? Pleeeeease!

[Tiq]

Now, everyone should be able to state their opinion about something like basketball without being mocked or insulted. If she were saying that in her opinion, the Holocaust never happened, then I would be right there with you guys. But...it's basketball. That's something that can be discussed without forming negative !@#$%^&*umptions or getting overly arrogant over it.

[Shock]

!@#$%^&* this topic.

[ESCANDAL0SA]

So first you say the Hornets players are skilless/no good/nobodies. Now by saying that all Iverson's teammates were "OK players" or bad players in his rookie year, you are implying that Paul's teammates, the ones, last I checked, you were badmouthing left right and centre, are above average/good players? Contradict much?

 

And LOSA, how does Iverson having one good game(58 points vs. the Hornets) a few years ago prove anything regarding his overall ability? Oh right, I forgot, Iverson is the best player of all time, even better than Michael Jordan... LMFAO! You just lost all credability with that comment alone. Do you think youre *opinion* is right compared to countless NBA analysts? Pleeeeease!

 

WOW, learn to read !@#$%^&*. i said IVERSON IN 2001...now, last time i checked, Iverson came into the league in 1996. duuurrrr you're wetaded according to you, Paul has AMAZING teammates, so he should be able to get into the playoffs, right? hahahahaha. Iverson being able to score 58 points is amazing, considering Paul will never average 30 points in his career, ever. it proves that he's a scorer despite being only 6'0". it proves that he has heart. what he's done already says enough. now, what Paul has done...is nothing. he will never be anyone important. first of all, real ballers know that MJ is good, but he's not the best. that can be argued in so many ways. MJ was in another time era, times have changed and the game has also changed. oh yea...Remorse...U MAD? lmaoooo.

 

 

Now, everyone should be able to state their opinion about something like basketball without being mocked or insulted. If she were saying that in her opinion, the Holocaust never happened, then I would be right there with you guys. But...it's basketball. That's something that can be discussed without forming negative !@#$%^&*umptions or getting overly arrogant over it.

 

 

lol i know. people go crazy over me not "accepting" other opinions (supposedly). yet, this !@#$%^&* can do it, and he thinks it's perfectly fine. !@#$%^&*ing hypocrite.

[Audry]

lol losa, welcome to the wonderful world of internet

[No_Remorse]

I don't know whether to "accept your opinion" or to tell you, again, what I was trying to say. Your opinion is wrong. Iverson does not come close to Michael Jordan. They didn't even play the same fcking positon for fck sakes. MJ was a shooting guard, Iverson a point guard.

 

"Paul may have been rookie of the year, but he will never accomplish anything more. Iverson has the heart and drive nobody else does. who else can carry his team to the finals like iverson did with the 2001 Sixers? nobody on that team averaged more than 10 points other than iverson. all he had were OK players: rebounders, shot blockers, etc. Paul will never be on Iverson's level. Iverson is a scorer, he can miss 10 straight and can't wait to take another shot. i love that about him."

 

You are saying Dikembe Mutumbo is not a good player? HAH. One of the best centres of all time, toots.

 

"WOW, learn to read !@#$%^&*. i said IVERSON IN 2001...now, last time i checked, Iverson came into the league in 1996. duuurrrr you're wetaded according to you, Paul has AMAZING teammates, so he should be able to get into the playoffs, right? hahahahaha. Iverson being able to score 58 points is amazing, considering Paul will never average 30 points in his career, ever. it proves that he's a scorer despite being only 6'0". it proves that he has heart. what he's done already says enough. now, what Paul has done...is nothing. he will never be anyone important. first of all, real ballers know that MJ is good, but he's not the best. that can be argued in so many ways. MJ was in another time era, times have changed and the game has also changed. oh yea...Remorse...U MAD? lmaoooo."

 

I guess, being a ball hog, compared to being a team player makes the player superior? I don't think so. Chris Paul does a little thing I like to call, involving his teammates. Like someone said earlier, the way he plays is comparable to Steve Nash with his passing ability.

 

Michael Jordan(14 years in league): fg% .445 / 3p% .291 / ft% .835 / rpg 6.2 / apg 5.3 / spg 2.35 / bpg . / TO 3.23 / ppg 30.1 / Fg career total 24 537 / 3p career total 1 778

 

14 time All-Star

Olympic Gold Medal Winner—1984, 1992

Five time MVP—1988, 1991, 1992, 1996, 1998

7 time The Sporting News MVP

Rookie of the Year—1984

Defensive Player of the Year—1988

11 times All-NBA—10 times first team, 1 time second team

9 time All-Defensive First Team

Sports Illustrated "Sportsman of the Year"—1991

Named one of the 50 Greatest Players in NBA History in 1996

Records

 

Most scoring !@#$%^&*les—10

Most NBA Finals MVP awards—6

Highest career scoring average—30.12

Highest career scoring average playoffs—33.45

Most consecutive games scoring in double figures—866

Highest single series scoring average NBA Finals—41.0 (1993)

 

Allen Iverson(11 years in league): fg% .423 / 3p% .311 / ft% .777 / rpg 3.9 / apg 6.2 / spg 2.3 / bpg 0.1 / TO 3.76 / ppg 27.9 / Fg career total 17 200 / 3p career total 2 984

 

1996-97 Rookie of the Year

1996-97 All Rookie First Team

1998-99 All NBA First Team

1999-00 All Star

1999-00 All NBA Second Team

2000-01 All Star

2000-01 NBA All Star MVP

2000-01 NBA MVP

2000-01 TSN MVP

2000-01 All NBA First Team

2001-02 All Star

2001-02 All NBA Second Team

2002-03 All Star

2002-03 All NBA Second Team

2003-04 All Star

2004-05 All Star

2004-05 All NBA First Team

2005-06 All Star

2005-06 All NBA Third Team

 

He is a good player, even a great player, just doesn't stack up to MJ.

 

By the way, the only thing that Iverson has that Paul doesn't, is a huge fan base. Just wait, oh you just wait.

 

... What the fck was I smoking to waste all my time on this long winded post. Good day.

[Chambahs]

Remorse, i agree with you 100%. Well, i dont know about the paul stuff, but with the MJ vs AI, yes, i do.

 

Me and losa have gone through this many, many times before. Her whole point is that there werent any good shooting guards around for MJ's compe!@#$%^&*ion. This is her thought, if t-mac, kobe, ect ect werent around, AI would look just as good as jordan did, maybe better. In a way, i see what she means, but also in another, i dont think that really qualifies it.

 

If there was a brand new zone, you were the best dueler, you were 50-0 for duels, undefeated, and then you retired SS. You would be labeled the best dueler in that zone, in records.

 

(In losa's opinion, this is Michael Jordan)

 

3 years later down the road, the zone is oh so popular, there are tons of great duelers, people who just sit and duel ALL DAY LONG, and you are one of them. Our of all the great duelers you beat most of them, and end up being 45-5 in the records.

 

(AI)

 

Now, if you were to take the first dueler's prime, and put it up to the 2nd dueler's prime, (MJ vs AI), the 2nd dueler would win, because he didnt own newbs to get to where he was at, he owned some of the best. Sure, the first dueler owned some of the best, but some of the best AT THE TIME which wasnt really that good. The zone's settings switched to being harder to master, map is different, and theres so many new people now laming the !@#$%^&* out of you, so everything is much harder now. Which is why the 2nd dueler would own the first dueler, purely because he has a higher level of skill.

 

This is all what goes through losa's mind when it comes to MJ vs AI.

 

Im not saying i agree, im just saying i understand. And i broke it into subspace situations for you guys to understand better, and to help me explain.

[»Ceiu]

What the !@#$%^&* are you people even bickering about?

[Shock]

^

[ESCANDAL0SA]

Your opinion is wrong. Iverson does not come close to Michael Jordan. They didn't even play the same fcking positon for fck sakes. MJ was a shooting guard, Iverson a point guard.

 

uhhhh you're a dumb!@#$%^&* lol. are you saying that IVERSON out of all players is NOT a shooting guard? lmaoooo. Iverson is not a point guard. that's a fact. he has the ability to run the point, but let's face it, he plays shooting guard as good as anybody in the league. AI's actual position is SG, but Larry Brown decided to play him as a PG on the team at times, though he played more like a SG. his other coaches after that liked his ability to see the floor, so they gave him more playing time as PG because they believed he's dangerous in the open floor with the ball. this doesn't mean that his natural position is PG though. YOUR facts are wrong. get them right? :S

 

You are saying Dikembe Mutumbo is not a good player? HAH. One of the best centres of all time, toots.

 

again, Mutumbo is a good defensive player, but offensive? lol. the guy barely averaged any points. all he did was stand in the paint, block shots and shake his finger at people.

 

I guess, being a ball hog, compared to being a team player makes the player superior? I don't think so. Chris Paul does a little thing I like to call, involving his teammates. Like someone said earlier, the way he plays is comparable to Steve Nash with his passing ability.

 

LOLOLOLOLOL, please don't ever compare Paul to Nash. Nash just crumbles the kid :/ and BTW, the stats you posted made you look like a complete fool because Iverson averages more asissts than Jordan lmaoooooooooo. guaranteed, Iverson's !@#$%^&*ists will go up in the seasons to come as well. sorry, try again? !@#$%^&*, this is too easy.

Edited May 20, 2007 by L0SA

[Tiq]

again, Mutumbo is a good defensive player, but offensive? lol. the guy barely averaged any points. all he did was stand in the paint, block shots and shake his finger at people.

 

He has also averaged for his career, over 10 rebounds a game and has shown himself a capable scorer when he gets the ball in his hands. A career fieldgoal percentage of 51% tells me that he is a capable offensive player, and can be relied upon to supplement the offense even if most of his energy is put forth towards defense. Don't knock Mutumbo, woman! The man's a beast, and was a huge part of the Phili trip to the finals.

 

Now...let's get back to the women part of this thread

[Shock]

You can't make it to the finals without a dominant inside game.

 

Oops, almost forgot the woman.

 

http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a207/fcuktheshutup/jessica-alba-nude_081.jpg

Edited May 20, 2007 by Shock

[ESCANDAL0SA]

He has also averaged for his career, over 10 rebounds a game and has shown himself a capable scorer when he gets the ball in his hands. A career fieldgoal percentage of 51% tells me that he is a capable offensive player, and can be relied upon to supplement the offense even if most of his energy is put forth towards defense. Don't knock Mutumbo, woman! The man's a beast, and was a huge part of the Phili trip to the finals.

 

Now...let's get back to the women part of this thread

 

he's not a complete offensive player. you can't depend on him as a second option for scoring. his game is focused mainly on defense. he didn't take the scoring load off iverson with the sixers. instead, he helped the sixers with better defense by scaring the other team away by standing in front of the basket. iverson was a huge part of the sixers trip to the finals, everybody chipped in little things but it was iverson who put his team on his back and did all that.

Edited May 20, 2007 by L0SA

[ESCANDAL0SA]

ew shot, wtf is that thing? lol. she looks like she's been deprived of food for days.

[Gravitron]

Never heard of Iverson.

But again, I haven't exactly been following the NBA for the past decade or so.

Jordan and Barkley used to display lovely duels whenever they met as their teams matched, each pulling great maneuvers trying to out-do the other.

And there've been some others as well there been the Harlem Globe Trotters back in the day.

That's about all I care to remember from that sport.

 

PC gaming potential, now, has only just begun to being explored and the fullest extent is far from being reached to its maximum.

[Audry]

... losa, are you talking about shock? its Jessica Alba ffs

[No_Remorse]

Lol, ok, Iverson is a 6'0 shooting guard. The way the league is going, the positions are getting taller and taller. So you are saying you are going to match Ivy against 6'6" and up? his !@#$%^&* would be getting blocked left right and centre.

 

And regarding his !@#$%^&*ists being only 1 more than Jordan, that isn't all that impressive. Overall MJ's stats are better.

 

Chambahs, I'm glad you agree with me, but your post seems to side with LOSA... For some reason... There was plenty of good players in that era, if not more. I will go ahead and name them when I have more time, but yet again, I have to go to !@#$%^&*sucking work on this fcking long weekend.

 

As for Chris Paul, he, in my opinion, has already proved himself and in his 2 year career to even some of the most skeptical NBA fans. He led all rookies in points, !@#$%^&*ists, steals, and minutes in his first year. So you can take away the credit he deserves all you want, the fact remains he is, and will be a top point guard in this league for many years to come. Good riddance to Baron Davis, I'd rather have this guy. Sad to see PJ go but he is old and probably going to retire next year.

[Shock]

Now...let's get back to the women part of this thread

[Audry]

Or lets not.

 

waddap Jared?

[Shock]

hi.

[ESCANDAL0SA]

... losa, are you talking about shock? its Jessica Alba ffs

 

that's a really bad picture of her.

[Audry]

well, its not the best picture of her, but still