Jump to content
SubSpace Forum Network

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 670
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

more and more: (btw, im getting these all off of google...)

http://www.bikini-usa.com/southbeach/jillian%20kiessler/jillianKiesslerlay.jpg

http://www.secretsoncam.com/image_female59/image-1.jpg

http://www.totalfitnessmodels.com/custom/bigstockphoto_Sexy_Bikini_Model_547250.jpg

Posted
listen up you fckin !@#$%^&* dumpster. i'm not the one who lives on these forums, so who is the !@#$%^&*ing nerd? the amount of !@#$%^&* i get is not an issue, because it never has been. the amount of !@#$%^&* you get isn't something you should be proud of. now im through with your disease ridden self and this dumb!@#$%^&* arguement. and by the !@#$%^&*ing way, iverson isn't !@#$%^&*.
Posted
LOL, OH NOES, he's cracking "!@#$%^&*" jokes at me now. i'm so offended, let me go cut myself now. lmaooooo. seriously now. why don't YOU go suck on a !@#$%^&* you !@#$%^&* gurgling !@#$%^&*. hahahahaha. live on the forums? elaborate or stfu? kthnxbye. aww, you're through with me? !@#$%^&*, i'm gonna miss you. and Iverson > Paul. don't be mad because it's true. maybe your Paul will retire with a memory of making it to the playoffs once in his career and getting swept away? it's okay, princess. Iverson in his first year alone has accomplished more than Paul ever has. enough said.
Posted
!@#$%^&*ING POSE.

 

STOP BEING SELFISH, FFS.

 

 

[May 15 19:45] Shock: I'd like to apologize ahead of time for something I said on SS forum. blum.gif

 

i see now.

 

meany :(

Posted (edited)

actually the only things iverson had better stats on his rookie year over pauls was 3P%, off rebs, and points. Paul outperformed iverson in: FG%, FT%, def rebs, total rebs, steals, and !@#$%^&*ists.

 

So looking at things statistically Paul had an overall better rookie year than iverson did.

 

Edit: Iverson also took 835 more shots than Paul did his rookie year.

 

Iverson has always been a gunner.

Edited by NBVegita
Posted
why? cause L0SA would kick your !@#$%^&*?

 

lol no, don't bring me in it.

 

actually the only things iverson had better stats on his rookie year over pauls was 3P%, off rebs, and points. Paul outperformed iverson in: FG%, FT%, def rebs, total rebs, steals, and !@#$%^&*ists.

 

So looking at things statistically Paul had an overall better rookie year than iverson did.

 

Edit: Iverson also took 835 more shots than Paul did his rookie year.

 

Iverson has always been a gunner.

 

 

i appreciate your input but that's not what i meant. !@#$%^&* stats. i'm talking about accomplishments. rookie of year, 5 straight games scoring 40+ points, ranked among league's scorers even though he was a rookie, etc. Paul has done none of that. not even close. he will NEVER be an MVP of the leauge. he will NEVER lead the league in scoring 3+ times.

Posted (edited)

most likely because he will never take 2000+ shots in a season.

 

I'm not a fan of either one but in iversons first year with the 76ers they went 22-66, at least the hornets went 38-44 pauls first year.

 

Edit: Chris Paul was the rookie of the year in 2005.

Edited by NBVegita
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...