Jump to content
SubSpace Forum Network

Recommended Posts

Posted
lol...i watched every game of nuggets/spurs. ask CHAMBAHS, i watched a game with him, and he will tell you that the calls were questionable. replays CLEARLY showed no foul. and it's no secret that the refs do favour certain teams.
  • Replies 670
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Cry me a river... Just like any other sport, if it looks like a foul, that's how it gets called. And the refs dont favour certain teams, you just see things from your own point of view and forget to look outside of the box... Like I said, i could give a fck about the Spurs, but they still, and have for quite some time, been a better team than the Nuggets. Which aren't even that great of a team anyway. lol, that is gonna spark some controversy.

 

Spurs for 2007 NBA champs! I'd be rootin for the Hornets but they never seem to make it to the playoffs, or get eliminated in the first round... Just wait and see what they can do next year though after getting 13/14th pick in the draft, Hornets are going to take everyone by surprise baby.

Posted (edited)

you're stupid lol. any person who knows anything about the NBA knows that certain teams get the benefit of the doubt. ESPECIALLY THE SPURS. if it looks like a foul? lmaoooo get real. the human error in officiating alters the outcomes of games. if you go back and look at a lot of games, calls at the end of the games that weren't even fouls, changed the outcome. it's a fact that refs favour certain players/certain teams. why do you think veteran players get certain calls and others don't? !@#$%^&* outta here lol. look outside the box? why don't you look outside the box? have you even watched any games? why do you think players like Kobe/Iverson/etc. get calls and rookies don't? because the time they have been in the NBA have earned them the respect of the officials. it's the same for teams. Spurs will get the benefit of the doubt over any other team because they're a veteran team and because they've been to the finals many times in past couple of years. use your !@#$%^&*ing head. for someone who claims to know so much about basketball, it's disappointing to see that you know nothing.

 

EDIT: and do you know how easy it is to fake a foul like the flopping Spurs? any player can scream and fall to the ground, and they get a foul. but reality is, they haven't even been touched. mind you, the Spurs flop like no other. Ginobili flops like a !@#$%^&*ing soccer player. the problem is, these refs don't base fouls on what they see, but what the reaction of the player is.

 

btw, !@#$%^&* the Hornets lol. they're never going anywhere in the West. they should get ready for another disappointing season next year.

Edited by L0SA
Posted

It's obvious that you are a typical teenage female with more estrogen than knowledge about the sport. So please do me/us a favour and quit living the falacy that whatever you say is the truth, as I pointed out earlier.

 

Anybody who knows the NBA? Little girl please, I've been watching NBA games since I was 8(when you were still in diapers) and I am now 22.

 

The refs carry no bias towards certain players, and for !@#$%^&* sure, don't favour any one player over another. If it looks like a foul, it gets called... No matter who the fck it is. And it is a fact that the refs favour certain players/teams? Where can I find where this is written? And with which players and what teams?

 

Any player, and any team, can "flop" at any given time. Nobody can be perfect, without mistakes, in every single game, even an outspoken, know-it-all dummy like yourself can(hopefully) grasp this concept.

 

And regarding the Hornets, Chris Paul is, by far, the most promising point guard in the NBA right now, don't even fcking say he isn't, because he is. Tyson Chandler, Peja Stojakovic, David West, 1st round draft pick... Need I say more?? Also, at least I'm not the type of guy who claims to like a team whenever they start to get noticed/good. Unlike some people... *cough*losa*cough* I've liked the Hornets since the Grandmama/LJ days, can you say the same about your beloved Nuggets? No, I didn't fckin think so.

Posted (edited)

k, i'm only gonna say this once, HOP OFF THE !@#$%^&*ING BANDWAGON ABOUT ME CLAIMING THAT WHAT I SAY IS THE TRUTH BECAUSE I NEVER !@#$%^&*ING SAID THAT, AND YOU'RE ONLY ON THAT !@#$%^&* BECAUSE EVERYBODY ELSE WAS. so, i'm about to be 19, you're 22. OH WOW, what a big !@#$%^&*ing difference. i've been watching the NBA since i was !@#$%^&*ing 4 and started understanding it when i was 6. kthnx. you obviously don't watch any games whatsoever. if you did, you would hear commentators saying themselves, when players commit an offensive foul but get to shoot 2 freethrows, that the only reason is because they've earned the respect lol. you're !@#$%^&*ing dumb. i've been following the Nets during the playoffs, and EVERYBODY has been on the refs about not giving Carter the benefit of the doubt and giving him more respect when he drives into the lane because he's a VETERAN/SUPERSTAR. you just proved right there that you don't watch games. if it's a rookie vs. veteran on a one-on-one play, the majority of the time, the rookie will get the foul. for example, lemme dumb this !@#$%^&* down for you: a veteran charges at a rookie whose feet were JUST right outside the circle under the basket, the veteran will get the call, and shoot 2 free throws. i see this ALL the !@#$%^&* time. lol @ Chris Paul being promising. he hasn't done !@#$%^&* yet. potential is one thing and making it happen is another. you can keep making yourself believe that the Hornets will go somewhere, but reality is, they won't. sorry to burst your bubble, princess. Tyson Chandler is a !@#$%^&* player. he hasn't proven himself. another wasted draft pick. AND my favourite players are Iverson and Melo. so, yes i have been following the Nuggets for years. i also followed the Sixers for more than 7 years. what's your point? i don't jump from team to team, dumb!@#$%^&*. don't make !@#$%^&*umptions and think that you actually prove a point with it lol because you clearly haven't. you don't know which teams i !@#$%^&*ing follow so why don't you refrain from typing? you know i'm not gonna stop, so you might as well stop now.

 

EDIT: i find it funny that you call me a "little girl" because guarateed, if this was face-to-face you would've had your face knocked the !@#$%^&* out before you even got 2 words out. talking about how i don't know about sports? lol. you don't !@#$%^&*ing know me. i have a higher sports IQ than you do.

Edited by L0SA
Posted

penelope cruz is not that hot...

 

lol doosh, you proved once again how stupid you are. not because a girl is hot that she is a !@#$%^&*. go!@#$%^&*, GROW UP KID!
Hmm... true... but a hot girl that spreads her leg saying EAT ME can be considered a !@#$%^&*...
Posted
penelope cruz is not that hot...

 

lol doosh, you proved once again how stupid you are. not because a girl is hot that she is a !@#$%^&*. go!@#$%^&*, GROW UP KID!
Hmm... true... but a hot girl that spreads her leg saying EAT ME can be considered a !@#$%^&*...

 

 

I prefer the term man's best friend.

 

Sigh guys, wtf am i gonna do with you ;)

 

Jared :wub:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...