BlueWyvern Posted April 12, 2007 Report Posted April 12, 2007 Kill it's rotation and turn it into a juggernaut carrier. Why not make Hyperspace more fleet based? Make Lancaster require support to survive. Specialize each ship around this Lancaster. Heavy cannons that can only be fired once every 10 secs?Give each ship a specialized role that only that ship can fill.I like how the Warbird is a superiority fighter. The Leviathan needs better something? Perhaps my slot idea could be of use here. Another idea is instead of making fields as they are. ACTUALLY MAKE THEM LAUNCH AS THE NAME IMPLIES. Make them shoot a specified distance from the user. It would make them deadly effective in bases (a sort of thor if you will). Quote
Dr Brain Posted April 13, 2007 Report Posted April 13, 2007 Lancs have always been meant to be carriers, only the problem is that I've never quite figured out how. Maybe they shouldn't be able to attach to other lancs. Quote
»Ceiu Posted April 13, 2007 Report Posted April 13, 2007 Indeed, and have a rather hefty turrent penalty. Turrets weren't an issue until MANTARAY demonstrated how semiwarp + lanc + spider * 3 = hyperdeath. Quote
Suicide_Run Posted April 13, 2007 Report Posted April 13, 2007 Na, turret wasnt an issue until the previous reset be4 the current one cause when I started playing I hardly see turrets. Now a turret pops ups when theres 2-3 ppl playing besides the turret freq...=.= Quote
Swift Warrior Posted April 13, 2007 Report Posted April 13, 2007 turret started LONG before the ssc welcomeback. But yeah, lanc not attaching to other lanc's might be good Quote
Sharpflame Posted April 13, 2007 Report Posted April 13, 2007 Sharks should be attachable!lol Lancs should use the turretpenalty feature, maybe a really slow rot. speed with turrets would help. Quote
*rc 1223* Posted April 14, 2007 Report Posted April 14, 2007 i hate turrets they should be banned lol alll ppl do now is turret Quote
naabster Posted April 14, 2007 Report Posted April 14, 2007 Have i metntioned that my diet consists of turrets and safelaming? along with the occasional owning of someone (or getting owned by BLASTED FLETCH WB"S {BANNEM}LOL) but yeah. turrets are no problem, i kind of like the lanc, though the attaching to each other is nasty when lancrush is enabled :/ I do think the tachign should be done away with.. and shark needs a bomb of sorts. l1 no shrap prox emp that fires every 4 secs? Quote
Sharpflame Posted April 14, 2007 Report Posted April 14, 2007 Haha, I really thing we need to have every ship attach to shark, also make lancs unable to attach to other lancs. Also, lanc unable to attach to shark? Haha, I would love to see a miniature turret flying around... Quote
Deathmonger Posted April 14, 2007 Report Posted April 14, 2007 Lancs have always been meant to be carriers, only the problem is that I've never quite figured out how. Maybe they shouldn't be able to attach to other lancs. 1. Slow down their acceleration and turn rate dramatically. They are currently relatively nimble.2. Don't let them have semiwarp burners. Lanc attaches are currently the main counter to lanc brickwarping so I'd suggest solving that problem first by implementing the anti-brick brick and then maybe remove lanc attaching. Quote
Swift Warrior Posted April 14, 2007 Report Posted April 14, 2007 theres no problem with lanc, its just semi is being used making it very hard to kill Quote
Sharpflame Posted April 14, 2007 Report Posted April 14, 2007 I noticed in desert storm, you cant brickwarp, you just get pushed out of the way. We need that! Quote
Deathboy-evil Posted April 14, 2007 Report Posted April 14, 2007 I noticed in desert storm, you cant brickwarp, you just get pushed out of the way. We need that! Lies! You can't get rid of brickwarping.. ever.. lol question.. what if u get bricked in a base than.. your going to get bricked to the other side of the wall in the base.. won't work.. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.