AceSpades Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 He may have pulled a Gramps (for those who don't know Gramps left us and took all his bots) but he was still a cool guy to talk to. Every time Knight banned me for over a week he would cut it down after a couple of days. He was someone who could listen but he obviously lost his cool and, with one power surge, took it in his liberty to try and prove he had the bigger e-penis. I think the zone will still go on to be strong with freakmonger and Knight. So I can't say I'm too bothered by this, just the forum part =/
Shlazzer Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 SVS was an !@#$%^&*. A power tripping abusive tyrant, in my opinion. Even so, his contributions to the zone shouldn't be forgotten. I never really talked to him much, but he seemed to be an ok guy, except for constantly banning me for non-existant "spamming." Why he decided to lower himself to Gramps level and go delete a core part of the Metal Gear community is beyond me. Might as well go out with a BanG, eh? See ya around Goat.
Muskrat Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 I'm sure SVS thought it was his right to assert some kind of his power over Kirk, and who the !@#$%^&* would mess with the guy who made subchat?
CRe Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 well in my experiences I've noticed that people have a certain limit to what they can take. I guess people went over SVS' limit.
Gravitron Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 His kind should never be in a position of authority to begin with.This is what seperates the infantiles from the mature, the novice from the professional -- never abuse.If you can't handle it then walk away, don't drop the house down with you.Accipere quam facere praestat injuriam.
CRe Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 well he lived with the powers for a long time.
jacob hunter! Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 somebody HAS to replace him as BanG Admin. Or innocent ppl will keep getting trapped in Bans... OK well heres an idea. assign A GOOD MATURE PERSON WHO PEOPLE THINK WILL DO GOOD ON THIS TASK: assign this person just for the task of handling ban disputes, nothing more. can't you custom make his power levels? Well then set it to where he can't ban anyone and !@#$%^&* people over. there, problem solved.
»freakmonger Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 BanG Admin needs the powers that have been previously !@#$%^&*igned to that positions for certain reasons. The problem isn't the powers !@#$%^&*igned to the position, but the person !@#$%^&*igned to the position.
jacob hunter! Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 Picking is not a problem either..... You would be perfect for it.
Testtube Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 svs owns you The damage that was done to MG was lite. While i think the proof speaks for itself and is very clear what happened. it all happened the way i wanted it to. I had every opportunity of removing SVS access from the zone and the website a full 16+ hours prior to it happening. I decided not to in order to see what would occure Now we know. Even though i am the one that found evidence linking svs to the removal of metalgears website i still have a hard time believing he did it even though it all happened as expected. I guess you dont really ever know somone especially if its via the internet While what he did was absolutly wrong. He could of done far worse.
1$hot Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 After reading the whole situation..this has to be the most childish act i have ever seen but then again there is agurus with the $100 bit I wish MG Ctf the best of luck and TT + Kn|ght. But yea at this point SvS = Idiot of 2007.
Audry Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 yeah, i always thought he was way more mature than that =/
Mr. Right Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 lol @ the people who thought SVS was "mature."
jacob hunter! Posted April 1, 2007 Report Posted April 1, 2007 ok what does svs owning anyone have to do with anything.......... and tt wtf...... Why wait to see !@#$%^&* happen you moron. If you allready had reason enough to remove him then just do it. don't !@#$%^&*ing let it get worse.... Your actions caused more delay and hurt. and to add to 1shots comment. LOL I wonder who's going to be 2008 idiot of the year omg lol.
Samapico Posted April 1, 2007 Report Posted April 1, 2007 LOL I wonder who's going to be 2008 idiot of the year omg lol.Don't worry, I'll vote for you
PoLiX Posted April 1, 2007 Report Posted April 1, 2007 Well. Figured he'd go over the line eventually. We had a rocky relationship, but eh. Sad to see him go this way. I was once going to go for the job when Swift was nominated, but I just doubt a website op would be netop. CybeRise had the powers once, but eh. Council seems to dislike me anyways, haha.
activation Posted April 1, 2007 Report Posted April 1, 2007 eh, me and svs were kind of bipolar in terms of relationship. in one breath he reduced a ban I got undeservedly, in another he gave me a year long netban out of spite. hopefully the next elected will be understanding to the extent of not letting a player's relationship interfere with the severity of the punishment. I'm really not thinking this kind of topic is a joke, as I wouldn't put it by svs to do something like this. First it's Julius Ceasar, then Gramps, and now SVS. I can see why Knight doesn't want to step up and take zone ownership .
Knight Posted April 1, 2007 Report Posted April 1, 2007 I'm pretty sure I'd have just left your ban stay, But I'm dilligent in the removal of idiots. I already said I'd be willing to step up as the zone owner, however I doubt the public would like that. I'm a major !@#$%^&*hole to alot of veteran players, simply because they turn jaded and synical and ruin the fun for the newer people of the game... so I've made far too many enemies... so far, until further notice, Myself and freakmonger will be taking charge of MG together, however as far as I'm concerned, the guy is honest, very knowledgable, and he pays the bills. In my mind, he can do as he pleases, I trust the dude
X`terrania Posted April 1, 2007 Report Posted April 1, 2007 No, Knight, you ruin the game for new players.
Recommended Posts