BlueWyvern Posted March 28, 2007 Report Posted March 28, 2007 The Overthruster sucks, why?It has great thrust sure, but without any high maximum speed to drive UP to, you end up dodging slow anyways.You can't dodge with it and dodging was what it was made for, my opinion is to give it no speed degrades, sure it seems small but throw fins on it and you have a slightly fast and agile drive, even without fins at least you can dodge better... The IceFire sucks, why?Sure it's fast and people can run quick in them, well until a big !@#$%^&* spider guns you down or a rocket shredder cuts you down. Running isn't everything and the icefire lacks any ability to dogfight properly, though not as bad as the overthruster I would suggest that something be done to the icefire to give it some sort of advantage, perhaps deprize 3 rotation instead of 1 and giving it an additional thrust upgrade. In my opinion the icefire is a subpar drive but it's still somewhat useful. Overall I think it's the overthruster that needs a small boost in performance but that's just me. You can judge for yourselves.
Sharpflame Posted March 29, 2007 Report Posted March 29, 2007 Blue, icefire was fixed. Its good now. Try it.Retro rockets was too.Overthrust was too but ur not happy with it. 3
Footballstar8583 Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 IceFire + Slipstream or ion drive IceFire=High grade interception systemSlipStream=Higher speed. Reduced protectionIon Drive=Basic propulsion system http://i205.photobucket.com/albums/bb305/Gfxman1/Pokemon.gif
*rc 1223* Posted March 31, 2007 Report Posted March 31, 2007 here was i would use lol for speed and turning for ships (if i had the money) wb:man. fins + ion jav:man. fins + ion spider: retro rockets lev:ion terrier:h2 + ion wzl:h2 + ion lanc:man. fins + h2 + ion shark:man. fins + icefire (for a fast scout ship or center lamer ) WB > *
★ D1st0rt Posted April 1, 2007 Report Posted April 1, 2007 retro is nice on a jav, was trying it out yesterday _UU___UU__SSSSS____AAA____UU___UU__SSSSS____AAA____UU___UU_SS_______AAAAA___UU___UU_SS_______AAAAA___UU___UU__SSSSS__AA___AA__UU___UU__SSSSS__AA___AA__UU___UU______SS_AAAAAAA__UU___UU______SS_AAAAAAA___UUUUU___SSSSS_AA____AA___UUUUU___SSSSS_AA____AAJ.C. Dento> prime example of why america will never be a world super power.Moscato> d1 is mad he will never have a job outside subspaceI can't see this because I turned signatures off. ps VT
11___________ Posted April 2, 2007 Report Posted April 2, 2007 are the fins really that good? http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Pork%20Shoulder.pnghttp://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i42/OurleaderSparky/porksig.jpg
Suicide_Run Posted April 2, 2007 Report Posted April 2, 2007 Man. Fins are pretty good at offsetting the negative effects of reactor plants that slows you down or icefire (cause of the rot/thrust). Its good to have unless your making a ship for a specific purpose cause in my opinion dmg reducing armor is better than fins in a base. The Ladder Theory - How high are you on the ladder? http://img210.imageshack.us/img210/1228/unseeov9.gif
11___________ Posted April 4, 2007 Report Posted April 4, 2007 my stupid hybrid wb. its the only good center ship i have, yet its still extremely good for basing. http://card.mygamercard.net/sig/Pork%20Shoulder.pnghttp://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i42/OurleaderSparky/porksig.jpg
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now