Jump to content
SubSpace Forum Network

Recommended Posts

Posted
Maybe we should post out the top 3 people in each category. Like top 3 in attack bonus, top 3 in defense, top 3 (excluding ail) in soldiers ect. just to give them recognition in what they did well in.
Posted
I would quote Samapico's post that quotes everyone elses, but I don't want to be gay like the rest.

 

But, I agree smile.gif

It's not gay.... jsut merely stupid in your opinion.

 

I believe ail should be opted out of the rankings do to either the adjustment in his favor, or the error in his favor.

 

AGREED.

Posted (edited)

Umm... just when is the reset? Have I missed out on something important here?

Edit: I saw Post #51 of Akbar al ... thingy! ... so the reset must be on the 1st.

I suppose the bank will also be emptied :( oh well...

Edited by Synook
Posted
I believe ail should be opted out of the rankings do to either the adjustment in his favor, or the error in his favor.

 

I *might* could see your point if he was not in the top 5 before this bug happened. But he has ALWAYS been in the top 5 (maybe top 3) since day one. !@#$%^&* I only remember for a VERY SHORT time when he was NOT #1. So this would not be fair and just by suggesting this it makes it seem that you just despise him :D

Posted (edited)
I believe ail should be opted out of the rankings do to either the adjustment in his favor, or the error in his favor.

 

I *might* could see your point if he was not in the top 5 before this bug happened. But he has ALWAYS been in the top 5 (maybe top 3) since day one. !@#$%^&* I only remember for a VERY SHORT time when he was NOT #1. So this would not be fair and just by suggesting this it makes it seem that you just despise him :D

 

 

i agree ail was always in top 2 only one time for about 5 mins was root in front of him laugh.gif

Edited by *rc 1223*
Posted
My arguement wasn't if he was in the top 5 the entire time. It was that you cannot compare someone gifted 100k troops against people who were not given the same advantage. But being he has corrected the issue I don't have further problems with it.
Posted
Actually, the one who will win is obviously the one with the largest army (me) ... because your strength is only limited by your number of soldiers... I have trillions of $ in my bank and I can't do crap with it...
Posted

There are two updates that absolutely *need* to be done:

 

UP cannot have a max. However, it also cannot increase linearly. It needs to be a regressive function. The first round was a linear UP, and everyone's UP exploded. This time UP had a low max causing the bank and cost of maintaining weapons to exceed income. Not only that, but troop numbers didn't reach the level in which casualties could become a factor.

 

Attack turns should have a rate of two an hour. That translates to a little more than 4 attacks per day, which is plenty. Infact, two per hour may be too much. If turns were valueble, it would be impossible to attack on the hour. That way if income is a little higher than it should be, it won't be a disaster.

 

 

A third update I would like to see, though it isn't crucial, is the addition of a new type of soldier. In most KoC games, there are "miners". They are trained units that stay out of combat and bring in more income.

 

In our case, I think we should have a "greener". However, I think they should NOT bring in extra income, and should only stay out of OFFENSIVE combat...if Adam attacks Bob and Bob has no defense but a !@#$%^&*load of greeners, Bob deserves to lose some of them. I've seen too many ASSS who relied upon the indestructible nature of miners...to be honest I've done that myself a couple times. However, if Bob has 1000 offensive weapons, he shouldn't have to send 10000 soldiers in to battle when most of them are unarmed anyway.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...