Soup Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 Well i guess Halo changed servers and tv gave Agurus staff and bang. Anyways so today i come into Halo and see that Agurus is staff again, and then i asked Agurus wheres my money for winning HDT2 since i still havnt gotten it and its been 2 months. (He stole the money) All i did was i asked him once and then all of a sudden i was banned for 2 years. I dont know why people keep giving both of them chances on any server because everything they do, they !@#$%^&* up. They both abuse 24/7 and im sick of it. That is all.
The Apache Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 i really don't believe true_vision banned you. true_vision isn't like that man. agurus, on the other hand, should be gone...
Soup Posted September 23, 2006 Author Report Posted September 23, 2006 Well tv didnt ban me, but he re-hired Agurus and gave him banG. Then Agurus banned me.
Agurus Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 Look at the tracking number and then talk. If that is not your address it sucks to be you. 7 days is not 2 years. TX to Canada takes a while to ship, and it has been less then a month since when I sent it
Soup Posted September 23, 2006 Author Report Posted September 23, 2006 Still why am i banned? You are an abuser and should be dealt with but no u cry ur way back to ss
Blaine Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 why is soup banned...whats the reason hes banned for?
Synister Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 I can bet that soup already recieved the cash and blew it on crack.
Mr. Right Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 what happened to: http://forums.sscentral.com/index.php?showtopic=11780 ?
ThunderJam Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 Hmm lets look at this: TV and Beef were co-owners of halo on SSCI.TV moves Halo to SSCB while beef is offline.TV fires beef while he is offlineTV bans beef while he is offline.Did i mention the ban about 6500 days long?Then TV rehires Agurus as sysop.Agurus posts in news saying the move from servers comes with help from SVS and Altec. How in the world does this make any sense at all? Someone please tell me.
Agent Smith Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 I think this is the greatest move of all time, gj TV.
»Purge Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 I don't see Halo on SSCB or any other server...
»freakmonger Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 Hmm lets look at this: TV and Beef were co-owners of halo on SSCI.TV moves Halo to SSCB while beef is offline.TV fires beef while he is offlineTV bans beef while he is offline.Did i mention the ban about 6500 days long?Then TV rehires Agurus as sysop.Agurus posts in news saying the move from servers comes with help from SVS and Altec. How in the world does this make any sense at all? Someone please tell me. About as much sense as Death+ making beefie co-owner. Actually what just happened with Halo moving makes way more sense then what Death+ did.
ThunderJam Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 I would expect TV to have been careful as though.After having the first whole fiasco, if he wanted to get rid of beefie, he should have done it by the book, not this crazy scheme. Beef is still unaware of it cuz he hasnt gotten online yet. I wouldnt be surprised if halo lost ssc billing.
PoLiX Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 Ok... Lemme lay it out. Agurus is going to be removed, or the zone is removed, simple as that. Me and Altec have already stated this. SSC Policy is that a net-banned player can not sysop an SSC zone, or so last I knew. Ghost Ship approved the move. And had no issue with the removal of beefie. They came to be and Altec wanting hosting until they could get ASSS complete and possibly move onto another unnamed server. After some talk, we agreed to give them help. Although we only did so thinking Agurus would have no involvement in the zone, as it was the main cause of issue, and an issue we wanted to stay out of.
ThunderJam Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 Wouldnt you have named some clause to keep agurus out? Cuz he was obviously gonna come back if beef was gone. And, werent you one of the ppl saying death changing staff was wrong, yet now you guys do it urselves? Why should i co-owner be able to be fired (plus banned for 6500 days) by his own co-owner?
Altec Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 Let's make something’s clear here. 1) I took on the zone because death was manipulating it. Which in fact it was not owner of to begin with; He decided to make beef co-owner over night. If I’m wrong correct me, I don’t really care. 2) Ag was no longer sysop/owner. AG burned his bridges with me a long time ago when I hosted halo. That’s why he is NOT owner of halo as far as I’m concerned.
Chronic Killer Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 Im confused.... From what I here, true_vision and beefie were the new owners. True_vision fired beefie over night (when he was offline [so I here not sure if it is true]). Then True_vision hired AG back and made him sysop.... Thats my understanding of what happend... So what I don't understand is why is halo down? Well, basicly down on SSCB [which is pretty lame]. The only thing I can think of is someone said AG couldn't be part of halo (or a mod) and AG got back his power so someone took down the server. I'v been playing in Halo for years, and I think it has went downhill sence AG has been in power (for the fact that he doesn't care about anything but him self and what he thinks is cool). Still Halo is halo and I think it's pretty outragious that this keeps happing, Keeps getting taken down and put back up. I WANT HALO BACK.
SVS Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 Halo isn't down right now, I am sitting in it as we speak.
Chronic Killer Posted September 23, 2006 Report Posted September 23, 2006 Halo isn't down right now, I am sitting in it as we speak..... Ok, it isn't down, but the server that it is on sucks.
»freakmonger Posted September 24, 2006 Report Posted September 24, 2006 My question is how Death+ was able to take it on himself to name a co-owner of a zone he wasn't an onwer of. This isn't normal procedures for SSC correct?
PoLiX Posted September 24, 2006 Report Posted September 24, 2006 This has all been settled in a long discussion between myself, altec, svs, and agurus. Agurus knows where he sits now, and understands what he can and can not do.
protoman.exe Posted September 24, 2006 Report Posted September 24, 2006 So agurus wasn't removed, nor was the zone. Yet he is still staff.
Recommended Posts