Lord-Mustang Posted September 2, 2006 Report Posted September 2, 2006 Glad to see this is open again for discussion.
Dav Posted September 2, 2006 Report Posted September 2, 2006 is there much to discuss now the flames have died down?
»i88gerbils Posted September 11, 2006 Report Posted September 11, 2006 Okay, the SSC has had enough time. What was the resolution of this matter?
»Swift Posted September 11, 2006 Report Posted September 11, 2006 Ban not lifted, SVS still a Bang Admin. Nuff said.
»i88gerbils Posted September 11, 2006 Report Posted September 11, 2006 So the logs would then prove that Schitt did in fact had a motive to threaten SSC security? Cause apparently that doesn't seem to be the whole story from some people.
Agurus Posted September 11, 2006 Report Posted September 11, 2006 This game is being ran by corrupts wtf do you expect to happen? And before I leave I am releasing the logs to show his innocense and who really was behind this. (Sorry D)
Mr. Right Posted September 11, 2006 Report Posted September 11, 2006 Ban not lifted, SVS still a Bang Admin. Nuff said.which is not a good thing to say the least.
The Apache Posted September 11, 2006 Report Posted September 11, 2006 this is !@#$%^&*ing disgraceful. MUTINY!
true_vision Posted September 11, 2006 Report Posted September 11, 2006 No respect for each..other....This is corrupted.....and i think Subspace Somehow will die cuz of that , I mean Cuz of every Corrupted person . Lets hope its wont happen ^_^ Long Live To SS And yes schitt got netbanned for no freaking reason...
»Maverick Posted September 11, 2006 Report Posted September 11, 2006 Let's put an end to this thread unless someone reveals some real evidence.
»i88gerbils Posted September 12, 2006 Report Posted September 12, 2006 I find it silly that schitt seems to be compared to sage386 in terms of sekrat SSC communications and deliberation.
Agurus Posted September 12, 2006 Report Posted September 12, 2006 Real evidence? Maybe I will post it here but they will probably remove. I will summarize it here. Death+ is trying to make SVS look bad, and attempt to be removed from power for abuse (sort of what they try to do to me). So he used the domain issue with DS to do so. There is more other !@#$%^&* involved svs I will email you the proof. Don't belive me I can show you the proof
Gravitron Posted September 12, 2006 Report Posted September 12, 2006 OMFG! SVS! I HATE YOU! YOU BANNED ME FROM METAL GEAR!I"LL HACK DOWN ALL OF SSC! Oh nos, look at that, I threatened SSC security.I guess I'm net banned, now.I mean, I'm such a bad !@#$%^&*, like schitt is, I could easily topple all of the zones and biller.Ask Death+ if you don't believe me.I guess you'll just have to go ahead and ban me now.(And give me and GS another reason to laugh at this game.) Seriously, the only one who was ever cut for threatening security (and this rule was set in place by Xalimar, to protect his servers, to begin with) was CatID, perhaps Sage386 (though he byp!@#$%^&*ed that one easily, after all - russian hacker) and perhaps or or two others.All in all, there are very few people who could actually posses the willing and technical knowledge to be able to harm any of the SSC via the narrow access window which is the biller access port allocated to their zone. Get a grip.Get a life.Get a tissue...I'm laughing my eyes dry.Ban replaced by Viligante. Due to improper removal by a non BanG admin. The only people allowed to remove a network ban are bang admins or the person who placed it, seeing as how you are neither it was very wrong for you to touch it. I suggest next time you follow the guidelines, I know you are aware of them seeing as how you were there when they were adopted.A little known fact, MikeTheNose is/was in all actuality (at least several some years back) a SSC NetOp.Although he dies it, of course (but back then he sang a different tune, and proofshowed his true capacity when it suited him).So, in effect and infact, he is a BanG Admin, just not an official(y listed) one.Cool, huh?
schitt Posted September 13, 2006 Author Report Posted September 13, 2006 logs? there aint any. the ban will stay, because svs has the say so on that one.. and we already found out even the head of the council cant lift it. so i guess i'll sit til september 26th or so when its up.. kinda funny, i beleive the last day of ban, is my bday.. happy bday to me. -schitt
»Swift Posted September 13, 2006 Report Posted September 13, 2006 Agurus - post what you want. It wont be removed. I'll make sure of it.
Gravitron Posted September 13, 2006 Report Posted September 13, 2006 SA>SwiftAttack, the freedom fighter candor...doesn't suit you.
L.C. Posted September 13, 2006 Report Posted September 13, 2006 And before I leave I am releasing the logs to show his innocense and who really was behind this.Drama !@#$%^&*, leave already.
»i88gerbils Posted September 13, 2006 Report Posted September 13, 2006 No I prefer that he did release what he does know. That way we all can learn what the !@#$%^&* Death+ is trying to pull here.
schitt Posted September 13, 2006 Author Report Posted September 13, 2006 this sure went off the topic of my ban, to agurus's... ;x
schitt Posted September 13, 2006 Author Report Posted September 13, 2006 and if death+ is trying to get rid of SVS, so be it.. hes the one who authorized my WRONGFUL ban.. which i still have YET to see any logs.. funny how that can happen aint it..
Gravitron Posted September 14, 2006 Report Posted September 14, 2006 In that other thread, someone said he's happy to see agurus and confess go regardless.Now I say I'll be more than happy to see SVS go, regardless.I'm sure some mutual acquintances won't be sad to see SVS go, either.
Agurus Posted September 14, 2006 Report Posted September 14, 2006 Belive it or not, even though I (and others) dislike him, he is keeping this comunity up regardless of how you see it.
Gravitron Posted September 14, 2006 Report Posted September 14, 2006 Loki: simply put, I laughed my balls off!
Mr. Right Posted September 14, 2006 Report Posted September 14, 2006 Belive it or not, even though I (and others) dislike him, he is keeping this comunity up regardless of how you see it. yeah, by sucking up to people.
Recommended Posts