hendrix

Hi, I guess reds dissolved in my absence. I've been starting a new job and now I finally got everything straight. I have Sundays off, so if a squad is need of a pilot, I would like to play. -hend

returning

Yeah you would need some advantage definitely. 1-0 lead is fair to me. Having a 1 kill advantage to 6 kills is already pretty strong, 2 would be good if we went to 12. If you don't want to do sudden death I'm down to talk about k/d or anything else as well, I just threw that out there. No matter what we do... Llamas get an advantage. 4 and 5 est is fine with me. I can't see my squad disagreeing either. I think 3 and 4 would be fine with us too. Hend

This^ I wasn't there for the game but heard through the grapevine about what happened. I don't exactly understand all your ideas.... but I don't think Street wants to replay game 1. So if llamas win both, they win. If we win both, we win. Should we tie... Sudden death, first to 3,4,5,6 kills? or first to get 2 kills ahead? (2-0, 3-1, etc). I don't get the kill/death thing... I mean, apparently we were down 3v4 for a long time because of bot issues, so that gives llamas a lead. At the same time, they could have been in the lead to begin with and won... so....................... I'm down with talking with SF about what we think is fair. I didn't see how the game was being played out, so I can't say llamas or reds were going to win without bot issues. At the same time I don't want to take a win from llamas... but at the same time maybe it would have been a win for us. We were lagging out apparently though... so that means something. SF: I say we just play the two games. Hopefully one of us wins both and that is the end to it. We can talk about what to do with a tie. Maybe we do kill death and give you a lead to start off with, or play an OT game, or something... so lets talk about that.

We agree to this ^^ Game 1 tomorrow at 4 est.

my squad wants next weekend... or late sunday, like 5 and 6....... so yeah.... I guess we could do one game this weekend and one next, so if we were to tie this weekend, it would basically be the same thing. Me and street were talking about 4 and 5 this weekend as well but the later the better for us (5 and 6) if we do it this weekend. Next weekend we can do it anytime.

haha I love how this resurfaces every few years. Always entertaining.

I'm not worked up and I believe you should re-read the post. The attacking thing was from in game play, also mixed in with what he has posted in the forum. He is the league OP. He shouldn't be sarcastic or attacking players for any reason. He is no longer just a player....... I know he is your squaddie, so obviously you are going to back him up. I have nothing against Caer at all, I have always been friends with him. Yes, the rules are the rules. If we let one move, then a floodgate of requests, directed towards Caer, would appear. It is a shitty situation, and I know it's no picnic dealing with subspace players in any capacity. My only point was that the post shouldn't have been made. There was no agreement, and until something is actually decided, with a vote, that what is being said on the council forum should not be posted for the public, for obvious reasons (you talk about the first few posts and the league would be up in arms... that is the whole reason for the council... to throw out ideas and make the league better, and make it easier on Caer).

See, that's where you're wrong. The 4v4 council, who will run the next season (hopefully), was made aware of this issue and two other roster issues a while ago. "Everyone" agreed that eleven weeks is plenty of time to actually figure out whether your squad is active or not. The roster locks are there for a reason. The time when it happens and who it affects is always a hot topic, though. The season length Rage referred to wasn't planned. Had I known we have 12 (more or less) squads, I would've either ran it as a pyramid or split leagues. The long season does give the council a bit of time to, well, work. So it all kind of works out. It turned out this way since squads formed after the league started. Maybe I should've just not let them join the league and listen to you whine on how I keep players who want to play from playing? Um... actually no... there was never any agreement... It was left up in the air (although it seems like a big enough of an issue to vote on). Many of the council disagreed on the topic of AR staying active, reds being given some slack, and players moving around. I never once asked for anything either, I only explained that they had 2 then they had 0 the next week, then 3 after that. I also said ReDS or other squads that are taking the place of inactive squads might get some chances to add some players to keep the league alive. Why are you posting what the council says here anyways? And above all if you do want to post it, post the truth. That thread was just throwing out ideas and no one ever came to a conclusion. I didn't want to reply or weigh in on this, but stop attacking my squad. We took the place of an inactive squad and so far most of our games have actually been close and not totally lopsided like every other game is basically every week. You shouldn't be personally attacking players either. If you were to punish weasel for wanting to play on another squad when he shows up and no one else does, and you let everyone else move.... well.... I'm not even sure what to say about that. Except that in reality, if the council did vote to let him move, he would be able to whether you like it or not.

sigh me up as Hendrix

Schedule is right except schocktech should be Reds Vs SFE.

would this go for players that are not currently active? can additions still be made?

This. And I'm whooping your ass this week in FBB.

I'm not quite sure why this was glanced over so quickly.... but the monopolizing of an arena, and forcecapping over, and over, and over..... is ridiculous. And that wouldn't even be that big a problem, if the stupid line didn't get fixed every time. I watched partsi get cap 7 times in a row last night, and every time it got forced to or from monkk's dumb team. I get not wanting Partsi in, but does it have to put him back infront every time so the same thing happens every time? The best part is it happens late, so once these ass holes are done, the arena is dead. In summary: Nuke is gay.

yea so I didn't know this site existed. I'm down. I actually made one and made it a keeper this season. It would be fun to be in one with you and kent. -hend

hendrix isn't ok?