I understand the difference between real life and games, you missed the point of my reply. Unix used the analogy of taking money from a non-FDIC backed institution and said it is legal to do if you do it in a round-about way, which clearly it is not. But no matter what it was wrong. In regards to a donation, how is it a donation made to Unix when someone had to do it for him/her in order for the donation to be given by the bot? Unix knew or had a hunch that the bot could be tricked and needed help to do it. So Unix's intent was to take something that clearly did not belong to Unix, and then got rid of the money because Unix knew it was wrong. If it was just a way to have fun then the money should have been given back, no questions asked. As far as spidernl wanting the money back, I agree. It should not have been taken in the first place and the person who took it should be punished, game or not.