You were better than the other team enough to win. With two teams of equal strength, the one with a anti-death rusher WILL win, ALWAYS. I don't care about the bricks, I don't want them unlimited, so don't even think that I want Bricks unlimited. I KNOW bricks are cheap. However, I also KNOW Anti-death SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGES A RESULT OF A FLAG GAME. BUT, IT DOES NOT GUARANTEE IT, as in your case. I don't know how efficent those Anti-death rushers were, but I could show you in game without fail, that if I had Antideath, I would force you to hold your position automatically for maybe 5 sec while you wait for me to respawn. And yes, 5 sec is not that bad, but only if the Anti-death rusher(s), as I realize now, can't use it effectively in the ways that make it cheap. Because if they don't then it's impact is minimal. A.k.a this: If I had Antideath, I would, and I know with a fact, slow your team down much more than without it. We don't see it get abused like bricks because antideath is made to be hard to get, and we reset the game (which keeps it that way) every so often. But if given enough time, until the point where Anti-death is normally used by basers, it will widen the gap plenty to notice. All the non-antideath players won't even TRY to base for a decent jackpot, which is already happening now in many cases. Fact: Antideath is broken. (Or will be, if it isn't used effectively right now, because I will eventually buy it and abuse it like the world is ending, if I continue playing the way I do right now.) I hope that if you won't understand this fact right now, I will force it into you over and over until you do via rushing your team. And I know that if I reach this point I WILL, because it's fact it's broken. Or, if not that, overpowered. I know this as much as a fact as 1+1=2. It is not as easy to prove by a long shot, but what I'm trying to say is just as much a fact. Of course, you will always have have a counter for EVERYTHING I say, and I mean EVERYTHING, including, this sentence, the fact that I mentioned this sentence, or the fact that mentioned that mentioned this sentence, or the fact that I... oh, forget it. I'm wasting my time with facts you won't absorb. You won't see the truth in my words regarding this subject until I prove it in an extremely obvious fashion, multiple times. However, the reason this is even an issue is because such situation are difficult to make, and rare in current Hyperspace. But I will do my best to prove this fact if I get to a point where this is possible. I agree. I think you got your "it's a fact" point across