Canada_rox

Don't worry. I remember you Requiem. Lols... from 6 years ago. My god I feel old now!

I actually cannot believe you still f'ing play Kentbrockman. The only reason I'm on this forum right now is cus someone sent me some lovely porn in a PM. I actually didn't realize my account was still kept :S

only idiots think war come without consequences for both sides. now as for her.. well i think she can make a point without using those kind of pics

Um why just US women here?? Well heres what i think, sure the girls here are probably hornier or fatter. But the girls in Europe dont' shave (ya thats rigth you want to see a womens pits?) and the big style right now there is to wear feathers. Ya feathers are dumb (exp feathersin your hair, boas etc.)

You know its no surprise that saddams been caught. Us intelligence is very capable and will catch Bin Laden as well. But its destroying Alqueida (i spelt that wrong I know) thats the tricky part. How do you stop ppl beleiving in God? Well I say god because they beleive in it so strongly that it is like beleiving in god.

Ew thats gross apple. oh -*BAD WORD*- the mental pictures... i lost my appe!@#$%^&*e.

I'm sure you have a valid point, but you sound too much like my teacher and i keep on zonening out. sorry. Although << Again, the problem as I stated remains. They can't make the tough decisions>> your probably pretty acurate there. Although its probably because the media decides to show this side.

The only problem with saying that is, is that back then they haden't yet come up with the idea of peacekeepers. Its not that they didn't want to, they just didn't have a proper plan to. The idea of Peacekeepers was proposed by Lester B Pearson (canadian) who won the nobel peace prize for his work. He was the president of the general !@#$%^&*embly in 1952 which around that time he proposed the idea of peacekeepers. They were then first used in the Suez Canal crisis (sucssefully) which was in 1956. So to sum up Canadians Rule and they had no proper plan of using soldiers back in the 2nd and 1st World War. You can't just send a bunch of soldiers into an area.

Don't be a smart -*BAD WORD*-. I know that. It can also mean its history (as i remebering their heritage). But directly translating I will rememeber is Je me souviens. They also use that for all they're posters about remeberance day. So think b4 you post something on this forum please

lol

lol Well i can't say i like the Aussie national anthem. I've never heard the NZ anthem. I like the France national anthem the best

By the way I have no clue on how this got to be a disscussion on whether or not the US is right about Iraq and about the usefullness of the UN. Or even about fries. *Don't bring the fries into this! They're innocent!*

Because our current flags (both Aus and NZ) have the Union Jack incorporated as a symbol of the authority of the crown. You may note that the republic members of the commonwealth (for example South Africa) do not. It's really only a matter of symbolism, such as changing the number of stars on the American flag to keep them in line with the number of States. I wasen't really thinking when I said that. I meant that Australia had continually been trying to change they're flag (unsuccessfully, obviously). Then the year I was living there they jumped ahead to having a referendum about whether or not they should seperate from the monarchie of England. I just thought it was a little silly that they should do that, when they haven't even sucssefully been able to change the flag. And I was talking solely about Australia and not NZ.

If you have such a huge problem with this thread then don't go. I told you before remeberance day was coming up (but its today, but at the time it was comming) and i was just noticing the differences of back then and now. Yeah i suppose if you want to simplify its another pro/con for millitary. But regardless to what you may beleive this isn't specifically about the americans. And I don't remeber saying 'did you lose a loved one in the war' so stop bugging me about the !@#$%^&*le. Now don't make me repeat myself again and stay out if you have such a huge problem with this

Ah yes i see where your comming from now. I had forgotten about that. You know I see that as you guys trying to get the world to give you attention. Thats probably really offensive to you, i'm sorry and maybe not accurate at all. And besides our countries values are different. I will look forward to your re-evaluation, although by then you might have to email me cus i might not still be on this. I think Australia's involvement in Iraq was based on Australia's alliegance(sp?) with the US. The US did a lot for Australia in WW2 and our defense is still tied to the US. We have 235 million muslims living in an unstable country right next door. Sure...they may not have an air force or navy, but one day they might. Australia on the other hand is a country of 19 million peeps who like to surf and have bbqs and stuff like that. So I think the Australian governments policy is to scratch Uncle Sam's back coz we might ask him to scratch ours some day. The main way that this was achieved was by Australia providing a small but substantial contribution that would have hopefully convinced uncommitted nations that there really was a 'coalition of the willing'. Its like saying 'hey...look...we are willing to put our bbq tongs down and fight for freedom....How about you cheese eating surrender monkeys pull your finger out too?' Canada on the other hand has the benefit of living next door. Who'd mess with Canada when your next door neighbour has more nukes than everyone else combined? So Canada can afford to sit back and take it easy and just be a moral crusader - which is fine by me. The world needs more of 'em. By the way. In what way do you see the values of Canada and Australia as different? Monte I can understand the way you aussies are thinking towards Iraq. It dosn't surprise me that i'm wrong. I'm glad i'm wrong. Although you mentioned that we can afford to sit back while the USA handles things. Our view on Iraq is different to America. We don't like war and don't want to jump into it if we have to. (it costs millions and jean chretien already voluteered us to peacekeep afghanistan, we can't handle War and the peacekeeping missions were on) If the UN decides that we should go to war then we will back the UN and go to war. Although we might be friends with the US we don't always see eye to eye. We aren't sitting back and letting the US do our 'dirty work for us', its just we don't agree and its more affordable to keep out of it.