spin

WOW, where to begin? A good deal of the puzzle has been laid out here to back up AstroProdigy's initial concern. Heck, even Dr.Worthless and Hackysack contributed -just not the way they intended! I guess first I should state the obvious--Dr.Worthless has a fitting nick-name and his arguments fit well with the discussion of neo-conservative propaganda driving our perceptions here in America. MonteZuma, your dead on about the cut and paste from the source, WITHOUT fact checking being part of the problem. white_0men, bingo with "Subs!@#$%^&*ute terror and communism and it's the same thing rehashed and reshaped, and the American public still fell for it." LearJett+, you have some good points, but I am sorry Bush/neo-conservatives are using our military like it is-- the Iraq War isn't about liberation. The idea of liberating a population from the rulers that US foreign policy placed in power to work with multinational oil companys is appealing, but whole scale invasions isn't how it is done, nor is it the reason for Bush's drive into the Middle East. There are many things that Dr.Worthless said that are pure neo-conservative bull!@#$%^&*... the inspectors being thrown out... Saddam not complying with resolutions as justification for the war, some things you said about WWII (actually Jewish organizations begged for us to bomb the camps to delay and disrupt more killing)... goes on and on.. This thread had about run its coarse with Dr.Worthless showing us how America's corporate media is indeed brainwashing and mislead far too many America voters. Lets open new threads discussing the errors of Dr.Worthless. In the meantime.... One of the better fact-checking sites that keep the ditto-heads from going too far is mediamatters.org And as a hint as to what threat to open up next might be who Bush's neo-conservatives are and how this mess or Bush's Middle East invasions and propaganda got its start even before Bush got "elected". http://www.house.gov/paul/congrec/congrec2003/cr071003.htm http://www.crisispapers.org/Editorials/PNAC-Primer.htm

Hi everyone -- Spinsanity here! Well, It is official.... Metal Gear zone Bans people for "talking about politics" This according to a guy that calls himself Testtube----- he imposed A ONE YEAR BAN on me for "talking politics" He claims "talking politics" is Metal Gear rule, but there is no mention of this in MG rules list. I understand why racism, or other abuse would be banned ... BUT FOR TALKING POLITICS ???? I am !@#$%^&*uming this testtube guy is a rabid mindless bush supporter, who has a fascist bent to his personality TestTube's version of a leader I can !@#$%^&*ure you I was not 1. disrupting the game play 2. being abusive 3. being racist 4. spamming (or otherwise taking up too many lines) In fact I was very much contributing to Metal Gear, even being a top flagger in the brief time I have been playing. I even recommend people in my chats to try out this zone. Before Testtube banned me, I was getting censored... being silenced for up to 1000 or 3000 minutes (could not get massages, or talk to my team or use other functions) Earlier, a green public message up "You will be silenced for talking politics" warning the whole arena that political conservation is not permitted, meanwhile talk of racism goes without punishment in Metal Gear. It seems in a game where there are shots fired and the enemy, and the fact that President Bush lied us into a illegal war where over 1800 of OUR troops have been killed, its a GIVEN that politics would crop up... especially when we have Limbaugh, Hanity, Savage, O'Riley spreading their propaganda and mis-informing the American voter. I would like the larger Sub Space community to voice your opinion, either ALL zones should ban players for political comments or they should not. I encourage you to monitor Metal Gear zone for further abuses. Thanks to all Spinsanity http://www.hermes-press.com/robot2.jpg