Trigger Happy

I don't trust someone with a ACDC Banner and Avatar, but point duly noted. I would agree that he changed his point, but then again, if I believed that they had nukes I would go to war with them to attempt to stop them from developing anything to dangerous. Oh and then if we couldn't find any, I think I would try to justifiy the war. Oh and wait, Saddam was ruthless and a cynical murdering -*BAD WORD*- that would try to destroy nations or anything to get what he wants. Soo, wait, the president, due to information show to him, decided that we should go to war to stop a warmongering dictator that our Intel believed had / was developing the infamous "Weapons of M!@#$%^&* Destruction" Well as much as it seems slightly idiotic, it seems to be understandable.

This flag looks good! Oops its France's flag sor... Nevermind they surrender.

I'm not sure, but I think that they should vote on this one, its totally dynamite. $$. It would be nice if we could get like, the little handflags to.

I think Gore should stay around, I thank God everytime I see him that Bush won that election. We would still be jousting with Afgan' leaders, let alone do anything about Iraq. If Iraq flaunted Nukes like Korea, we would have just taped them on the wrists like Clinton did ... bombed like what? outhouses. Gores a good reminder that things easily could be worse than Bush. Not saying Bush is the best, but I simply don't trust Kerry.

Personally I like to take my news from any Big Company (Usually CNN) and then take the opposite side. This is why. To the News Agencies there formula is simple: News = Money No News = No Money Money = Stuff No Money = No Stuff Make News = Make Money Questions? Given that the news isn't responsible for most events, but there perspective tends to be what the majority of society takes as there opionoins. Now if someone is innocent of a crime, but the news thinks they are guilty, people assume its right, the News tries to be judge / jury and executioner in a single swipe. They get people that support there views on camera and ignorant -*BAD WORD*-s that disagree to argue the opposition. So even the ignorant guy is right, they can make him out to be a moron. Given this isn't American news but never-the-less its news, I read on another fourm that people were outraged (France and it was spreading to American) about this bombing of the "innocents" in Iraq. American was "trying to hide" the clip which I had saw several months earlier online?? Ooh No they hid it well. In the clip we drove by and blew these guys to -*BAD WORD*- and they had nothing to fight our Choppers. It was supported by a news clip. Well little did they know the News Agency decided to cut the clip short. In fact the men had just hidden weapons in this corn field which consisted of several BAZOOKAS. By the way when the attack started, guess where they headed, back in for the launchers. Blarg whatever I'm done with this rant, its becoming incoherent. I know that was kinda lengthy and off a bit, but anyone else feel that way? Bottom line, News is biased.